On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 03:05:53PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Jarkko, can you please also help me to understand here more ?
>
> Sorry, I missed your original response.
>
> Umh, it was more like an open question and I'm not sure if it even
> makes sense. Maybe you can just ignore it until
On 10/01/2016 12:35 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:34:38AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
>> Currently, read_log() has two implementations: one for ACPI platforms
>> and the other for OF platforms. The proper one is selected at compile
>> time using Kconfig and #ifdef in the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 04:34:38AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Currently, read_log() has two implementations: one for ACPI platforms
> and the other for OF platforms. The proper one is selected at compile
> time using Kconfig and #ifdef in the Makefile, which is not the
> recommended approach.
>
>
