On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:51:42PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > CC linux-security-module
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:52:13PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Request and relinquish locality for the driver use in order to be a
> > > better citizen in a multi locality environment
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:32:35AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:52:13PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > + iowrite32(CRB_LOC_CTRL_RELINQUISH, >regs_h->loc_ctrl);
>
> Since regs_h can be null shouldn't there be some guards ?
Yes, there should. Thanks for pointing
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:31:57PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 12:07:51PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 96
> > > > > ++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 32
> -Original Message-
> From: Nayna [mailto:na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 11:17
> To: Jarkko Sakkinen ; Winkler, Tomas
>
> Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>
On 11/30/2016 10:29 PM, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
>>> Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
>>> not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
>>> firmware