On 11/26/2016 09:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:38AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
>> Physical TPMs use Open Firmware Device Tree bindings that are similar
>> to the IBM Power virtual TPM to support event log. However, these
>> properties store the values in different endianness for Physical
>> and Virtual TPM.
>>
>> This patch fixes the endianness issue by doing appropriate conversion
>> based on Physical or Virtual TPM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_of.c | 27 +++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_of.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_of.c
>> index 7dee42d7..4b0d5e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_of.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ int tpm_read_log_of(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> const u32 *sizep;
>> const u64 *basep;
>> struct tpm_bios_log *log;
>> +u32 log_size;
>> +u64 log_base;
>
> Maybe just base and size?
Hmm.. okay to keep names short, I can change to base/size. And since
they are used within log function, probably it is implicit that, these
refer to Log base address and size.
>
>>
>> log = >log;
>> if (chip->dev.parent && chip->dev.parent->of_node)
>> @@ -41,18 +43,35 @@ int tpm_read_log_of(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> if (sizep == NULL || basep == NULL)
>> return -EIO;
>>
>> -if (*sizep == 0) {
>> +/*
>> + * For both vtpm/tpm, firmware has log addr and log size in big
>> + * endian format. But in case of vtpm, there is a method called
>> + * sml-handover which is run during kernel init even before
>> + * device tree is setup. This sml-handover function takes care
>> + * of endianness and writes to sml-base and sml-size in little
>> + * endian format. For this reason, vtpm doesn't need conversion
>> + * but physical tpm needs the conversion.
>> + */
>> +if (of_property_match_string(np, "compatible", "IBM,vtpm") < 0) {
>> +log_size = be32_to_cpup(sizep);
>> +log_base = be64_to_cpup(basep);
>> +} else {
>> +log_size = *sizep;
>> +log_base = *basep;
>> +}
>> +
>> +if (log_size == 0) {
>> dev_warn(>dev, "%s: Event log area empty\n", __func__);
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>>
>> -log->bios_event_log = kmalloc(*sizep, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +log->bios_event_log = kmalloc(log_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!log->bios_event_log)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> -log->bios_event_log_end = log->bios_event_log + *sizep;
>> +log->bios_event_log_end = log->bios_event_log + log_size;
>>
>> -memcpy(log->bios_event_log, __va(*basep), *sizep);
>> +memcpy(chip->log.bios_event_log, __va(log_base), log_size);
>
> Why did you change the first parameter?
Hmm.. yeah..shouldn't be. Sorry, I think while redoing, I mixed up with
my previous versions. Will change it.
Thanks for noticing it.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
>
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
> /Jarkko
>
--
___
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel