On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:39:46AM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> >>+int read_log_of(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> >>+#else
> >>+static inline int read_log_of(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> >>+{
> >>+ return -1;
> >>+}
> >>+#endif
> >
> >Though shouldn't these two be ERRNOs of some kind? -ENODEV?
>
> Sure..
> Was
On 08/30/2016 11:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:50:16AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
>> Currently, the difference in read_log method for ACPI/OF based platforms
>> is handled by defining respective read_log method and handing
>> them using CONFIG based #ifdef condition in
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:50:16AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Currently, the difference in read_log method for ACPI/OF based platforms
> is handled by defining respective read_log method and handing
> them using CONFIG based #ifdef condition in Makefile which is not
> the recommended approach.
>
Currently, the difference in read_log method for ACPI/OF based platforms
is handled by defining respective read_log method and handing
them using CONFIG based #ifdef condition in Makefile which is not
the recommended approach.
This patch cleans up the ifdef condition in Makefile by defining
