On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:17:11PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:44:43PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> > I got these questions while testing some TPM2.0 stuff using the kernel
> > code from repo having this patch and am using Nuvoton TPM.
> >
> > #1. It seems that support is
Thanks everyone for discussion and clarifying the design points. This
helps and we can now test by changing our device-tree entries.
Also, we are assuming that just updating .compatible device tree entry
should do the fix. We don't have to add any additional .data property.
And driver will
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:31:52AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0500, George Wilson wrote:
>
> > > Yes, generally Linux expects DT to be set correctly by the boot
> > > firmware. Early firmware needs to know the TPM type anyhow to do the
> > > TPM setup, so
On 07/27/2016 12:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:30:09AM -0400, Dave Heller wrote:
>>> So you might do
>>>
>>>compatible = "nuvoton,npct650", "nuvoton,npct601"
>>>
>>> Andrew, is 601 even the right name?
>>
>> Hi Jason, I'm not sure I'm understanding your answer
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0500, George Wilson wrote:
> > Yes, generally Linux expects DT to be set correctly by the boot
> > firmware. Early firmware needs to know the TPM type anyhow to do the
> > TPM setup, so this doesn't seem like a realistic scenario.
>
> A reset is required after
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:30:09AM -0400, Dave Heller wrote:
> > So you might do
> >
> > compatible = "nuvoton,npct650", "nuvoton,npct601"
> >
> > Andrew, is 601 even the right name?
>
> Hi Jason, I'm not sure I'm understanding your answer here. Looks like
> we will have to add a couple of
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:03:44PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:39:02PM -0500, George Wilson wrote:
> > > Generally speaking probing is somewhat discouraged, currently we only
> > > probe for PC platform tis (and even that might be a mistake), all
> > > other drivers
On 07/26/2016 04:17 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:44:43PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
>> I got these questions while testing some TPM2.0 stuff using the kernel
>> code from repo having this patch and am using Nuvoton TPM.
>>
>> #1. It seems that support is added only for
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:17:11PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:44:43PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> > I got these questions while testing some TPM2.0 stuff using the kernel
> > code from repo having this patch and am using Nuvoton TPM.
> >
> > #1. It seems that support is
Hi
I might not be aware of some background related to TPM device driver
design and so have got few questions regarding recently added support in
Nuvoton i2c driver for TPM2.0
(http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/82cc1a49b6358394938e759dc4c22b2be773bbad).
I got these
10 matches
Mail list logo
