On 8/8/2017 3:11 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 01:52:34PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
Imho: NACK from my side.
After these viewpoints definitive NACK from my side too...
I responded to the thread comments separately. However, assuming NACK
is the final response, I have
Disabling the driver hook by setting class hook is totally sound design
not prone to error as evidenced by the single implementation of the
class hook.
Fixes: d1bd4a792d39 ("tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.")
Fixes: f77af1516584 ("Add "shutdown" to "struct class".")
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:34:20PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Disabling the driver hook by setting class hook is totally sound design
> not prone to error as evidenced by the single implementation of the
> class hook.
It was done this was for consistency, if you look at the full code:
