[Trac] Re: Start "tracd" with more than one user to authenticate

2007-11-06 Thread Simon Martin
Hi, > tracd -p 8080 --auth *,/./users,Peter /.../afser/ > > Authenticating for "Peter" works fine. But I also want to enable > authenticating for the other users in the "users"-file. I looked in > the documentation for it but it is only mentioning on how to manage > that for more than one

[Trac] Start "tracd" with more than one user to authenticate

2007-11-06 Thread petschni
Hi, I am starting the "tracd" Server with: tracd -p 8080 --auth *,/./users,Peter /.../afser/ Authenticating for "Peter" works fine. But I also want to enable authenticating for the other users in the "users"-file. I looked in the documentation for it but it is only mentioning on how to

[Trac] Re: Choosing path

2007-11-06 Thread Bobby
Hi, OK, I reinstalled with yum, created a pwfile with htdigest and dropped the users.htdigest file into /var/www/trac/conf and later into /var/www/svn/repo/test/conf Having setup access I then ran trac-admin and added bobby which shows up as TRAC_ADMIN with 'permission list'. The first time I

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Black
Alec Thomas wrote: > On 11/6/07, Richard Lyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Over thought? Today makes 2 out of the 3 times I've tried to >> 'show-off' trac hacks and it's been down. All three have been to [stuff deleted] First of all, thanks very much for getting t-h back up in October and

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Alec Thomas
On 11/6/07, Richard Lyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Over thought? Today makes 2 out of the 3 times I've tried to > 'show-off' trac hacks and it's been down. All three have been to > separate groups where I was advocating the use of Trac. Extensibility > through plugins are a life-line. We need

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Black
Richard Lyman wrote: > On 11/6/07, Noah Kantrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How about we just wait the 2 hours for an admin to notice and kick >> apache in the head? >> >> I think this is being seriously over-thought. If people need the code >> for plugins, it should all be available on

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Richard Lyman
On 11/6/07, Noah Kantrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about we just wait the 2 hours for an admin to notice and kick > apache in the head? > > I think this is being seriously over-thought. If people need the code > for plugins, it should all be available on PyPI as a "mirror" (assuming > th

[Trac] Re: "Connect" psycopg2 with selfcompiled Python version

2007-11-06 Thread Jonas Borgström
petschni wrote: > > Hello, > > I had to install/compile my own Pythonversion, since the version of my > hoster was too old. After that I also installed "psycopg2". (I could > not do the system wide installation, since I am not root.) > > But after that I was not able to find any documentation o

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Lars Stavholm
Christian Boos wrote: > Lars Stavholm wrote: >> Axton wrote: >> >>> On Nov 6, 2007 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up > to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a list of m

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Lars Stavholm
Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > How about we just wait the 2 hours for an admin to notice and kick > apache in the head? 2 hours long gone. > I think this is being seriously over-thought. If people need the code > for plugins, it should all be available on PyPI as a "mirror" (assuming What's PyPI? /L

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Aaron D. Marasco
While we're all going overboard, we can kindly ask the admin to make DNS entries for mirror1.trac-hacks.org, mirror2.t-h.org etc. If everybody offering has the bandwidth to spare, he can even round-robin downloads.trac-hacks.org and reduce the bill. - Aaron --~--~-~--~~~

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Noah Kantrowitz
How about we just wait the 2 hours for an admin to notice and kick apache in the head? I think this is being seriously over-thought. If people need the code for plugins, it should all be available on PyPI as a "mirror" (assuming the author was wise enough to push copies there). --Noah Axton wrot

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Axton
On Nov 6, 2007 11:13 AM, Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Axton wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2007 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up > >>> to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Christian Boos
Lars Stavholm wrote: > Axton wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 2007 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a list of mirror repositories or jus

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Lars Stavholm
Axton wrote: > On Nov 6, 2007 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up >>> to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a list of mirror >>> repositories or just be scheduled for periodic sync. >> Sur

[Trac] Choosing path

2007-11-06 Thread Bobby
Hi, I'm in a tight spot in regards to versions. My server is running FC4 which is using sqlite3.1.2. According to the install notes it's preferable to use 3.5.x. The server has an unusual setup which allows me to run four IDE drives on fully separate channels which is then soft-raided. Gettin

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Axton
On Nov 6, 2007 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up > > to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a list of mirror > > repositories or just be scheduled for periodic sync. > > Sure but this m

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Emmanuel Blot
> SVN 1.4+ has svnsync available which is also an option. It can be set up > to run as a commit hook and push out/sync changesets to a list of mirror > repositories or just be scheduled for periodic sync. Sure but this means TH needs to push information - therefore an operation is required on TH

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Black
Rainer Sokoll wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Blot wrote: > >>> using a distributed version control (like git, mercurial, dards) >>> instead of svn would at least make mirroring the plugins easy :) >>> >> Using SVN 1.4 on trac-hacks.org (and on t.e.o. BTW) wou

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Blot wrote: > > > using a distributed version control (like git, mercurial, dards) > > instead of svn would at least make mirroring the plugins easy :) > > Using SVN 1.4 on trac-hacks.org (and on t.e.o. BTW) would be a good > start: svnmirror co

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Emmanuel Blot
> using a distributed version control (like git, mercurial, dards) > instead of svn would at least make mirroring the plugins easy :) Using SVN 1.4 on trac-hacks.org (and on t.e.o. BTW) would be a good start: svnmirror could be used. SVN is widely used and has great, user-friendly GUI apps (such

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread rupert thurner
using a distributed version control (like git, mercurial, dards) instead of svn would at least make mirroring the plugins easy :) On Nov 6, 2:31 pm, Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rupert thurner wrote: > > hi, > > > could it be thathttp://trac-hacksis dead? > > Yup, all I get is "Wait

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Alex da Franca
let's hope, the holidays are shorter this time ;-) Am 06.11.2007 um 14:31 schrieb Lars Stavholm: >> could it be that http://trac-hacks is dead? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. T

[Trac] Re: http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread Lars Stavholm
rupert thurner wrote: > hi, > > could it be that http://trac-hacks is dead? Yup, all I get is "Waiting for trac-hacks.org..." What's the best way of mirroring the trac-hacks.org site? Any ideas appreciated. /Lars --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message b

[Trac] http://trac-hacks dead?

2007-11-06 Thread rupert thurner
hi, could it be that http://trac-hacks is dead? rupert. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[Trac] Re: Patching Problems

2007-11-06 Thread Andrew
Erik you're a star! I've got both patches applied. Thanks for the help. On 2 Nov, 17:05, "Erik Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aha! Of course. Your patch program just isn't converting the newlines > from LF to CRLF and thus is getting confused. Use a program like > unix2dos to convert the pa

[Trac] "Connect" psycopg2 with selfcompiled Python version

2007-11-06 Thread petschni
Hello, I had to install/compile my own Pythonversion, since the version of my hoster was too old. After that I also installed "psycopg2". (I could not do the system wide installation, since I am not root.) But after that I was not able to find any documentation on how to tell Python that it is s