On 12/4/2019 2:48 AM, Mo wrote:
Could you please describe what problem you are trying to solve with a
docker container?
I am not the one having a month-long thread, in year 2020, on how to
distribute an application with all its dependencies.
No problem here, moving right along,
Dima
--
On 12/3/2019 6:25 AM, Mo wrote:
...
Another idea could be that there is some developer would maintain a "Trac
distribution" with a central package management, and not every single
plugin developer needs to publish to PyPI. I mean after a developer has
released a code on a repository...
Why not
On 12/5/2019 7:11 PM, RjOllos wrote:
If you want my recommendation: write a requirements.txt, write some scripts
for maintaining/upgrading your site and setup an RSS feed so you can track
changes to plugins as they happen on trac-hacks and GitHub. Setup a staging
site, pull in changes, test
On 10/9/2019 6:40 PM, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
Dimitri thank you. I had not thought of Docker because I have avoided
thinking of Docker for years. That means I haven't allocated brain-space.
Maybe its time I did.
With core python being incompatible with itself and its DLL hell on top,
there is
On 10/9/19 2:06 PM, Jonathan Laufersweiler wrote:
> Another option would be to use PyInstaller to package up a minimal 2.7
> interpreter with the bytecode for Trac and its dependencies into a into a
> stand-alone executable package. This would make updating Trac more of a
> chore, but would
On 10/11/2019 2:57 AM, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
The Trac server will be Ubuntu 18.04 not Windows. Does that modify your
"no alternative."?
Containers aren't portable, you need a windows container to run on
windows and a linux one to run on linux.
As it happens, already running on the target
On 1/29/20 12:21 PM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> On 29 January 2020 19:09:14 ONeal Freeman wrote:
>> Is there a hit counter for trac to keep a count of how many users are
>> accessing the site?
...
> I'd probably go with Google Analytics or Matomo.
>
Ugh. https://goaccess.io/
--
Dimitri Maziuk
On 1/29/20 3:02 PM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> Wow, different thing but supernice.
>
Well, aside from not needing cookies (which would require modifying trac
templates I expect), it's very lightweight. Using something like piwik
or elk on one small-ish trac site would be way overkill. Google too,
even
