R David Murray added the comment:
Before I saw Barry's message, I removed 2.6 from the list of versions via the
web interface (which retires it). It can be re-added (un-retired) though, if
we have consensus on that. (It is id '1', which someone will need to know if
they do this.)
But, our p
I have no problem keeping 2.6 (or any other retired version) as an explicit
version in the tracker. It will never get fixed officially, but that doesn't
mean it's not helpful for 3rd parties to still discuss bugs and share patches.
___
Tracker-discuss ma
R David Murray added the comment:
Technically it is possible to search for retired version, and the search form
could even be changed to support it. I'm not sure that it is worth it,
though...I don't know what purpose would be served by searching based on
version as opposed to searching for a
Stephen Turnbull added the comment:
Ned Deily writes:
> You could make similar arguments about 2.5 or earlier releases (or
> 3.0), all of which have already been removed.
Indeed, I would.
> Since at least the time 2.6 entered security-fix mode, we have
> routinely deselected 2.6 from those
