On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:57:25 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> For use, in the end it did pretty much nothing for XEmacs or Debian;
> that's why I stopped. *They* were pretty good about forwarding
> relevant bugs upstream, but very little came from my efforts -- and
> not because I wasn't di
anatoly techtonik writes:
> How can they choose bugs that are only related to Debian?
They can't. But they certainly do get a lot of them. I made an
effort to follow the Debian bugs for XEmacs for almost a year, but
it's sort of like checking your spam folder for false positives.
There's some
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:12:19 +0300, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> If Roundup plugin system is reworked a bit, it is
>> possible to make extensions to create and monitor
>> upstream bugs (Debian). Maybe even exchange
>> messages with it.
>
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:12:19 +0300, anatoly techtonik
wrote:
> If Roundup plugin system is reworked a bit, it is
> possible to make extensions to create and monitor
> upstream bugs (Debian). Maybe even exchange
> messages with it.
That would be downstream, and I'm not sure why we would want to d
If Roundup plugin system is reworked a bit, it is
possible to make extensions to create and monitor
upstream bugs (Debian). Maybe even exchange
messages with it.
--
anatoly t.
___
Tracker-discuss mailing list
Tracker-discuss@python.org
https://mail.pyth
