On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:36 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Sounds like a GSoC project to me...
>
> I doubt that. Any form of folding would require users to click more to
> access the hidden controls, to which they have strongly objected.
>
> So the lesson learned is: don't fold this forms in any
> Sounds like a GSoC project to me...
I doubt that. Any form of folding would require users to click more to
access the hidden controls, to which they have strongly objected.
So the lesson learned is: don't fold this forms in any form.
Regards,
Martin
In article <2011033725.3a356140...@kimball.webabinitio.net>,
"R. David Murray"
wrote:
> For what it's worth, I vote -1 on the folded form. For now I've just
> disabled javascript for myself on the bug tracker, so it doesn't actually
> bother me, but if javascript features that I care about
David> For what it's worth, I vote -1 on the folded form. For now I've
David> just disabled javascript for myself on the bug tracker, so it
David> doesn't actually bother me, but if javascript features that I
David> care about are added later I might start to care again :)
While
For what it's worth, I vote -1 on the folded form. For now I've just
disabled javascript for myself on the bug tracker, so it doesn't actually
bother me, but if javascript features that I care about are added later
I might start to care again :)
--David
___
