Michael Albinus wrote:
Gilles Pion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've downloaded the latest emacs CVS snapshot (23.0.50.1),
What do you mean by this? An emacs-snapshot package as offered for
example for Debian/Ubuntu, or just the files taken from Emacs CVS? I
would recommend the latter
Michael Albinus wrote:
In fact *very* strange things are happening regarding file ownership when
accessed via tramp:
If this still happens with very recent Tramp 2.1.12-pre, please
provide traces with tramp-verbose of 8. Best would be a message
generated via `tramp-bug', including the
Gilles Pion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Gilles,
I've now removed from site-lisp my old tramp 2.1.11 which was hiding 2.1.12
. Everything seems to work ok regarding files modes.
Thanks for the feedback. Good to know that it works for you.
In fact, Tramp releases shall be the most recent
Sorry to jump into this thread, but I have the same problem and is not solved
for me
I've downloaded the latest emacs CVS snapshot (23.0.50.1),
I'm using tramp 2.1.11
Files accessed with /scpc2:root@hostname:/path/to/file still revert to
root owner when saved
Sascha Wilde-3 wrote:
Michael
In fact *very* strange things are happening regarding file ownership when
accessed via tramp:
* inside shell session as user A on node N: touch /tmp/zz
* /tmp/zz owner is user A
* editing zz as root via tramp (/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/zz)
* making changes
* save file
* file owner is now root
*
Gilles Pion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Gilles,
In fact *very* strange things are happening regarding file ownership when
accessed via tramp:
If this still happens with very recent Tramp 2.1.12-pre, please
provide traces with tramp-verbose of 8. Best would be a message
generated via
Michael Albinus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, at a quick test it didn't. I applied your patch (assuming it were
an revert patch), reevaluated backup-buffer-copy, visited and saved a
remote file, but with the same result, the group was changed...
[...]
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tramp 2.1.11 respects now the parameter PRESERVE-UID-GID of `copy-file'.
Does the following patch (files.el in Emacs trunk) help?
No, at a quick test it didn't. I applied your patch (assuming it were
an revert patch), reevaluated backup-buffer-copy,
Michael Albinus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The file /path/to/example on host bob is owned by root.foo
visiting it from another host as /ssh:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/example
editing and saving leads to it being owned by root.root.
I have
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Editing existing files as root changes ownership]
See variables backup-by-copying and backup-by-copying-*.
(Emacs behaves the same when run as root and editing the file normally.)
Was that it?
Yes, thanks!
Sascha Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The file /path/to/example on host bob is owned by root.foo
visiting it from another host as /ssh:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path/to/example
editing and saving leads to it being owned by root.root.
I have backup-by-copying set to t.
Any Ideas?
Tramp 2.1.11
11 matches
Mail list logo