Re: [Trans] text to address DKG's conspiring CAs attack

2016-03-25 Thread David A. Cooper
On 03/24/2016 11:09 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: David, No text in 5280 requires name uniqueness across all CAs. Untrue, as I'll demonstrate below. It does require uniqueness on a per-CA basis (Section 4.1.2.6 of 5280).

Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3

2016-03-25 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016, Stephen Kent wrote: If the certificates are doppelgangers, wouldn't that mean that they cannot have AIA's ? Otherwise at least one CA would be using an "unusual" AIA revocation location that monitors would detect. The doppelgangers could have AIAs, but they need not, and

Re: [Trans] updated Section 3.3

2016-03-25 Thread Stephen Kent
Paul, ... If the certificates are doppelgangers, wouldn't that mean that they cannot have AIA's ? Otherwise at least one CA would be using an "unusual" AIA revocation location that monitors would detect. The doppelgangers could have AIAs, but they need not, and that is the assumption I