Francesco Romani writes:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 13:35 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Somebody can see this bug report and the fix ?
>>
>> The problem : 'tcdemux -A' crash.
>
> Hi,
>
> The reported fix makes sense.
>
Hi,
Somebody can see this bug report and the fix ?
The problem : 'tcdemux -A' crash.
Christian
,
| Christian Marillat wrote:
| > Arno Schuring writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| >> ok, wrong example. Sorry, I should have been more explicit. This
happens
| &
Francesco Romani writes:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 10:51 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> toolame has been removed from Debian. I don't know if others distros
>> will do the same.
>>
>> Do you intent to move to twolame ?
>
> Hi,
&g
Hi,
toolame has been removed from Debian. I don't know if others distros
will do the same.
Do you intent to move to twolame ?
Christian
Francesco Romani writes:
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:09 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the latest imagemagick 6.5.1 transcode 1.1.2 doesn't build (Debian).
>
> Uhm.
>
> Can't reproduce on my test environment (sid i386 schroot, tes
Hi,
With the latest imagemagick 6.5.1 transcode 1.1.2 doesn't build (Debian).
Do you intent to move to graphicksmagic (normally scheduled for 1.2) or
to this new imagemagick API ?
Christian
Francesco Romani writes:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:05 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In both 1.0.0 and 1.1.0rc5 tcrequant is broken and produce viedo with
>> a lot of artefacts.
>
> Known issue. Unfortunately, it will not fixed soon becaus
Hi,
In both 1.0.0 and 1.1.0rc5 tcrequant is broken and produce viedo with
a lot of artefacts.
Also mplayer doesn't like the file, with hundreds of "Missing picture
start code" :
I did :
tcrequant -1 VTS_01_1.VOB -f 1.2 -o essai.mpeg
VTS_01_1.VOB come from a DVD.
,
| VO: [xv] 720x480 => 85
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 19:59 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did a small movie from jpeg files. The avi file build under an i386
>> machine is correct when the one I did on an amd64 machine is, wel
Hi,
I did a small movie from jpeg files. The avi file build under an i386
machine is correct when the one I did on an amd64 machine is, well
strange.
Where is the problem ?
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/tests/film-i386.avi
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/tests/film-amd64.avi
Christian
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:48 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> > To make such changes doesn't require a big effort, so I'll schedule
>> > them for 1.0.6 final.
>> Scheduled for ? I don't want to spend
"Francesco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> It is possible to add support for lzo 2.x ?
>>
>> The main reason is that lzo 1.x is deprecated and
Hi,
It is possible to add support for lzo 2.x ?
The main reason is that lzo 1.x is deprecated and has been removed
from Debian testing.
Also a test should be added in import/Makefile.am if transcode is
build without lzo, otherwise the nuv plugin doesn't build.
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> transcode 1.0.6rc2 is avalaible for download:
>
> http://fromani.exit1.org/transcode-1.0.6rc2.tar.bz2
I'm unable to download this tarball (404).
Christian
Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Who should I bug about getting the oss module included in transcode
>>> v1.1.0-alpha7 ?
>>
>> Should be done by upstre
Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[Note the Cc: to the transcode-dev list]
> first good news: I got driver-test to compile - just needed #include
>
>
> Who should I bug about getting the oss module included in transcode
> v1.1.0-alpha7 ?
>
> [transcode] warning: /usr/lib/transcode/imp
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> - NUV is expected to work only on x86 platform; otherwise, it works
> thanks a significant amount of luck. Enforce this constraint using
> a ./configure check.
I see a little problem with the nuv test in configure. You check the
arch only
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> 1.0.5rc2 will follow in a few days addressing this and libmpeg3 issue.
Thanks for the explanation.
Christian
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> transcode 1.0.5rc1 is avalaible for download:
This release doesn't build for amd 64 :
,
| In file included from /usr/include/asm/types.h:5,
| from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/sigcontext.h:4,
| from /usr/include/asm/
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Francesco,
> transcode 1.1.0 alpha 4 is avalaible for download at
[...]
> This release also includes a ``new'' feature: export_pcm is back,
> as requested by "Jason P. Stanford" ".
This module doesn't build :
export_pcm.c:30:20: error: avilib.h:
David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to use transcode in cluster mode on a beowulf cluster?
> Does anyone here have experience with this?
Why to not use dvdrip and the cluster mode ?
I'm encoding a 1:40 movie in 33 minutes (xvid 2pass, no fast resize
and big frame 768x416
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 10:49 +0200, Francesco Romani wrote:
>
> [...]
>> This release also includes a ``new'' feature: export_pcm is back,
>> as requested by "Jason P. Stanford" ".
>> Rationale for inclusion, even if this violates the alpha/beta policy
"Francesco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Got it. This error make sense since I don't use pvm stuff, and neither
> Andrew I guess :)
> I'll take a look ASAP. Until this get fixed, I recommend to disable
> pvm module in 1.1.0 builds, since it can be already broken.
OK, I did and uplo
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> fixed in new snapshot (and in CVS HEAD as well of course)
Thanks, but transcode still doesn't build :
,
| ../pvm3/pvm_parser.c: In function 'f_skip_space':
| ../pvm3/pvm_parser.c:48: warning: implicit declaration of function
'cf_skip_fro
"Francesco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/5/07, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is possible to add to the tarball name the current creation date ?
>
> It will be very soon, expect this change with next snapshot.
Thanks.
>
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> I'd like to announce the avalaibility of somewhot "suggested" CVS HEAD
> snopshots at usual http://fromani.exit1.org
> snapshot will always be located at
> http://fromani.exit1.org/transcode-1.1.0-cvs.tar.bz2
> and are made whan CVS HE
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I've just uploaded an updated 1.0.4rc0 tarball that should fix both
> problems. Build test passed fine in here with ffmpeg libraries (from
> your repo) version 3:20070630.
Thanks, build fine for i386, amd64, sparc, powerpc and ia64.
Christian
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi all
>
> Hi again,
>
>> I'd like the announce the avalability of transcode 1.0.4 RC 0, the first
>> Release Candidate that will lead (hopefully)
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all
Hi again,
> I'd like the announce the avalability of transcode 1.0.4 RC 0, the first
> Release Candidate that will lead (hopefully) soon to transcode 1.0.4.
> ImageMagick 6.3.x HDR fix is the main missing piece to complete the
> 1.0.4 cycle,
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all
Hi,
> I'd like the announce the avalability of transcode 1.0.4 RC 0, the first
> Release Candidate that will lead (hopefully) soon to transcode 1.0.4.
> ImageMagick 6.3.x HDR fix is the main missing piece to complete the
> 1.0.4 cycle, but it
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> date is expected to be released with no changes as
>> 1.0.3, so please test it and report problems (most notably in
>> configure/autotools part).
>
> B
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> final release candidate of 1.0.3 is ready to rumble.
>
> Get it from http://fromani.exit1.org
>
> This release candidate is expected to be released with no changes as
> 1.0.3, so please test it and report problems (most notably in
> config
Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> 5. 1.0.x release status
> ---
>
> In approx. priority order, the schedule is:
> * merge export_wav fix (that will be probably done at time you'll read this)
> * roll out hopefully last rc for 1.0.3
> * announce avalability o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Church) writes:
>>I don't know if these small bugs are already fixed in cvs.
>>
>>http://bugs.debian.org/403126
>
> I can't reproduce the aviindex issue in the 1.0.2 release, much less
> in CVS:
Yes of course. Next I'll check if a bug really exist...
[...]
> A
Hi,
I don't know if these small bugs are already fixed in cvs.
http://bugs.debian.org/403126
Christian
35 matches
Mail list logo
