As an example I have a many to many relationship between Product and
ProductCategory.
When I edit a product, it updates the DB but I have a duplicate in my
Product array. This duplicate is not in the DB, just the array.
Any ideas why this would happen?
Thanks
Devon
Ok. That didn't actually work since it also stops me from adding new
ones...
On May 27, 10:46 am, Devon Burriss de...@nervstudios.co.za wrote:
Not sure I understand the question correctly.
I am only adding 1 at a time if that is the question. This problem is
occurring when I edit an existing
Ok. So now I can add and edit without error or duplicates. Solution
was...
If it breaks something else i'll post it but so far this worked for
me. Please not that I am saving the product with transfer and the call
the function below, passing through the saved transfer object as
object and form
I tend to clear() then re- add(), that works for me. Depends on your
process.
Mark
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Devon Burriss de...@nervstudios.co.zawrote:
Ok. So now I can add and edit without error or duplicates. Solution
was...
If it breaks something else i'll post it but so far this
Cripes Mark, that's worrying if you have no idea!
I can't understand what Transfer might be asking of Apaches that's
causing it to pass the request through the RewriteMap function. Up
till now I've been using individual RewriteRule's without a prob. Even
if I make the map file blank Transfer
It sounds like the rewrite is affecting expandPath() somehow... but I'm not
sure.
Mark
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:16 PM, dickbob dick...@gmail.com wrote:
Cripes Mark, that's worrying if you have no idea!
I can't understand what Transfer might be asking of Apaches that's
causing it to pass
It's back up now. Not sure if it was a hickup on my network or
somewhere in between. But I'm glad it's working now.
On May 27, 10:15 am, Matt Quackenbush quackfu...@gmail.com wrote:
Works just fine in Texas.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Before posting questions to the
Actually, my workaround is just about exactly the same thing you are
doing. Unfortunately this uses the system datetime from CF, and not
the DB. With a cluster of 3 CF machines and one DB machine this could
result in 3 different times (if all the system times aren't
synchronized properly).
I
Hmm, well, this may be a crazy idea, but here's what I'd do if I
needed to accomplish what you are suggesting, which is to always
return the same, synchronized datetime value regardless of which CF
server the code was running on:
I'd create a DateHelper object with a getNow() method that would
Yeah, that would be another way to solve the problem. In my case I
suspect it would be easier just to spend a little time and get the
time on all the servers in sync.
This is one of those problems where I started by trying to wedge
something into Transfer that it doesn't really do in a very
10 matches
Mail list logo
