Mark,
That sounds good to me, because I wouldn't have to remember to do it in
every TQL statement.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: transfer-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mark Mandel
Sent: 24 November 2008 21:21
To: transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Caveats:
The databases have to be on the same physical server (or accessible
using this dot notation from query analyzer anyway)
I believe you can overcome this limitation by configuring a linked server,
so you can then
prepend the server name as in:
Hi all,
Transfer ORM should run on Railo 3.0.1.x. Luis Majano has tested
Canvas Wiki against it lately. And as far as I know there are only the
following known issues:
Quote from Luis:
1) Transfer cannot validate the datasource.xml with the
datasource.xsd, I have no clue why. I had to turn
On one of the projects I am working we got around the cross database
issue by creating a set of views on the primary database that simply
does a select against the the table in another database using the dot
notation that Jared mentioned. This has worked well so far. Note this
is SQL Server 2005
I knew there was a way to do that, it's just been long enough since I
did it that I couldn't remember what it was. Thanks, Dan.
J
On Nov 25, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Dan O'Keefe wrote:
Caveats:
The databases have to be on the same physical server (or accessible
using this dot notation from query
And a caveat on *that* (while we're doing a SQL Server tutorial) is that
under some circumstances joins to tables on linked servers are done by
issuing a prepared statement (i.e. stored procedure) against the remote
table for *every row* in the local table, which obviously scales
like...well,
A fish? No, wait, they're easy to scale.
A very tall, very smooth tree, coated with grease, while you're
wearing vinyl gloves and jellies flip-flops. :)
On Nov 25, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Jaime Metcher wrote:
And a caveat on *that* (while we're doing a SQL Server tutorial) is
that under some
Combine that with Paul's suggestion and you get something I'd rather not see ;-)
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Jared Rypka-Hauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A fish? No, wait, they're easy to scale.
A very tall, very smooth tree, coated with grease, while you're
wearing vinyl gloves and
