[transfer-dev] Re: Wiki Updates

Thanks for that Paul! Mark On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Paul Marcotte wrote: > Sure thing, John, I'll look at it later today. > > Paul > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21 AM, John Whish wrote: > >> Hey Paul, >> Just had a quick look (didn't realise my posts were listed!). Couple of my >> post

[transfer-dev] Re: Wiki Updates

Sure thing, John, I'll look at it later today. Paul On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21 AM, John Whish wrote: > Hey Paul, > Just had a quick look (didn't realise my posts were listed!). Couple of my > posts that you may want to remove > > Transfer and IBO (John > Whish)

[transfer-dev] Re: Wiki Updates

Hey Paul, Just had a quick look (didn't realise my posts were listed!). Couple of my posts that you may want to remove Transfer and IBO (John Whish) Using Paul Marcotte's Metro (John Whish)

[transfer-dev] Wiki Updates

Hey all, I just processed some updates to the wiki Tutorials page. If I missed anything please let me know. Cheers, Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-q

[transfer-dev] Re: cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

My bad!!! I was doing a page search for 'setrol' (since 'Roles' appears within every function dump). No wonder I missed it. Thanks for all the help. Everyone have a great weekend! TGIF, Jonathan On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:54 AM, John Whish wrote: > I don't think Transfer generates any method

[transfer-dev] Re: cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

I don't think Transfer generates any methods on the fly, so they should be in the dump. You could always clear the files generated in the definitions directory in case something odd was going on (and have a look at them although they aren't much help if you're after the API!) --~--~-~--~--

[transfer-dev] Re: cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

They should still show up in the dump as far as I know, are you sure you didn't just miss them? On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Burnham < jonathanburn...@gmail.com> wrote: > That did the trick, and I see what you mean about the nomenclature. > > Thanks Bob! > > Why, when I dumped the u

[transfer-dev] Re: cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

That did the trick, and I see what you mean about the nomenclature. Thanks Bob! Why, when I dumped the user object did I not see the add* functions, are those created on the fly? On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Bob Silverberg wrote: > You need to use the addRoles() method, which Transfer will

[transfer-dev] Re: cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

You need to use the addRoles() method, which Transfer will generate for you on your user object. See here: http://docs.transfer-orm.com/wiki/Managing_Relationships_and_Compositions.cfm#ManyToManyfor a detailed explanation of how to work with ManyToMany. Btw, I'd probably call the relationship "ro

[transfer-dev] Re: transfer and illudium

Thanks for the replies. The reason I was thinking of transfer performing the basic validation is this is something you do on every property. I wasn't thinking of transfer doing anything like business rules. Business rules might occur on none, one or many of the properties. It would just be nic

[transfer-dev] cascadeSave with a twist of manytomany

I'm afraid I am missing something here. On my site I have a 'sign up' form that should ultimately end with a new user having been created. Users have a manytomany relationship with roles. Like this: When I create a new

[transfer-dev] Re: Transfer version for Javascript

Yeah, only had a look at the docs but the jCFC looks like it would work well with getting a Service from ColdSpring. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions