On Jul 1, 10:40 pm, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated to the Trunk version and the errors have seemed to go away.
I'm going to load test it and low mem test it later this week and see
if it holds up.
I'm interested in your findings - I'm reasonably sure there is a mem
leak
I have transfer working on 3.1 perfectly.
On Jul 7, 7:12 pm, Shawn shawn.grig...@gmail.com wrote:
Bump?
On Jun 12, 7:33 pm, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Luis - can you be more specific than that?
Mark
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Luis Majano lmaj...@gmail.com wrote:
Any thoughts on this? I can repeat this behavior under multiple
configurations.
On Jul 3, 8:09 pm, whostheJBoss dotfus...@changethings.org wrote:
Sorry, here:
http://www.pastey.net/117046
On Jul 3, 6:21 pm, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried accessing the link.. it's
Actually, thanks for chasing this up.
Fun question for you then -
When you are using transaction.execute() (or even the AOP) within the
handler, and you intentionally throw an error to try and rollback the
Transaction, do you see any of the Transfer Transaction elements in the tag
context?
I'm
Sounds like I fixed one bug to introduce another...
I'll see if I can set up a memory leak test to run overnight in the next few
days.
Mark
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 7, 1:27 pm, Brian G brian-goo...@vfive.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 10:40 pm,
On Jul 2, 4:08 pm, John Watson wizpu...@gmail.com wrote:
(Simplified) I have:
object name=invoice table=tblInvoices
id name=invoiceId type=numeric /
property name=invoiceDate type=date /
/object
object name=invoiceItem table=tblInvoiceItems
id name=invoiceItemId type=numeric /
property
