Hi Bob,
Thanks for the reply, as it is a small list of records I have taken
the route you suggested using listByQuery() and it works fine.
Cheers
Stephen
On Jun 3, 10:27 am, Bob Silverberg bob.silverb...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot do that with Transfer, not in the way you suggest anyway.
Transfer works with objects, not table rows, so you'd have to ask Transfer
to get each object, update its property and then ask Transfer to save the
object. You could use one of the listXXX methods to get a query that
contains the records you are interested in, and then loop over that query,
getting each object, etc.
If the expected number of records is small this will probably be fine, but
if it may be a large number then you'd probably be better off just coding it
in SQL. If you do go that route (using SQL) don't forget to discard the
objects from the cache after you update them - otherwise your cache will be
out of synch.
Cheers,
Bob
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, stephend stephend...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Been using for transfer for awhile now but this is the first time I
have had to update a group of records in a table.
This is easy in straight SQL but how do you do it with transfer.
eg. Update tableName set defaultRec = Y where user = x
Thanks.
--
Bob Silverbergwww.silverwareconsulting.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
transfer-dev group.
To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
transfer-dev-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
