On 08/06/2006, at 9:02 AM, Nicolas François wrote:
> Also, I'm not sure a Pootle server is mostly doing write operations
> (the number of write operations is probably proportionnal to the
> number of
> users).
> The CPU may be more occupied in doing fuzzy matching of strings.
> I'm not
> sure
Hello Gintautas,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:17:28AM +0300, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strong opinion about the direction Pootle's backend should be
> headed. I think that at the moment you have a 'loose' system based on
> files, which is simple and transparent. However, it is
Hi,
> As the others have mentioned, yes, we are doing 2 major restructure:
>
> 1) base classing of our convertor classes and Pootle
> 2) Locking
>
> Some of this does affect backend separation.
>
> There of course is lots of work, but I understand that yours needs to
> be quite independent. We
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Might be best to run you branch from Pootle CVS on SourceForge as it
>> will allow easier syncing of your work with changes in HEAD. If you
>> feel up to migrating us to SVN lets chat.
>
> Would be good. I see things from a user point of view and,
