Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00.txt (1/19 to 2/2/2018)

Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:45 Subject: WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00.txt (1/19 to 2/2/2018) To: <trill@ietf.org<mailto:trill@ietf.org>> CC: <draft-ietf-trill-vendor-chan...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-trill-vendor-chan...@ietf.org>> This begins a 2 week WG

Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00.txt (1/19 to 2/2/2018)

This seems useful and I could find no problems with it. I think it's ready for publication. It enables the flexibility of passing vendor-specific information between like nodes without impacting non-like nodes. Radia On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Susan Hares wrote: > This

Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00.txt (1/19 to 2/2/2018)

Hi, I support this draft and see the comments inline. Regards, S. Kingston Smiler. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Susan Hares wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00 > from 1/19/2018 to 2/2/2018. > > > > During your WG last call

[trill] trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00.txt (1/19 to 2/2/2018)

Hi, Support the draft in this process, please see inline: This begins a 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00 from 1/19/2018 to 2/2/2018. During your WG last call comments, please consider: 1) Does this vendor channel provide flexibility for the vendors management