This begins a 2 week WG LC on two drafts on group keying: Simple Group
Keying Protocol and the profiles for simple key profiles to apply simple
group keying to the multi-destination TIRLL Extended Rbridge Channel message
and the TRILL -over IP (trill-over-ip) packet security.
As WG chair, I need to manage the last of the WG calls for the TRILL. We are
closing the TRILL WG and pushing to handle all the drafts in an effective
manner. Therefore, I am going to be more blunt that I normally am.
Are you asking to utilize TLS/DTLS instead of IPSEC tunnel mode on
This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-parent-selection-02.txt (2/2
to 2/16) which you can find at:
In your comments, please consider:
1) will the documentation of this problem and its solution benefit
In looking back at this email, I realize that all I did about  was criticize.
Here’s a concrete suggestion for what to do:
TRILL Priority DEI DSCP Field (Binary/decimal)
-- --- -
0 0/1 00 / 0
1 0/1 --TBD-
This doc is very confusing.
Its title and discussion throughout indicates “TRILL over IP”, including figs
in Sec 4, but the only actual encapsulations described are TRILL over UDP and
TRILL over TCP.
IMO, this needs a very deep scrub to resolve. It would help to understand that
> On Feb 2, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Susan Hares wrote:
> As WG chair, I need to manage the last of the WG calls for the TRILL. We
> are closing the TRILL WG and pushing to handle all the drafts in an effective
> manner. Therefore, I am going to be more
A couple of Diffserv-related follow-ups to Magnus’s comments:
> I don't really understand this change. Now you have priority 1 which points
> to the proposed new mapping for
> Lower than Best Effort, being the least prioritized. Then priority 0 intended
> to be more prioritized is CS1
Thanks for the quick response.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> Hi Donald,
> I have reviewed the changes and my comments. Please see inline for my
> feedback. I will remove text not necessary to provide context. It is
I have reviewed the changes and my comments. Please see inline for my
feedback. I will remove text not necessary to provide context. It is
almost ready now. There are two areas where I think there needs to be
some further improvements, DSCPs and TCP encapsulation. But the needed