Re: [trill] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10 - ECN & DSCP considerations

2017-06-26 Thread Black, David
Adding some comments on ECN and DSCP ... > > Section 4.3: > > > >TRILL over IP implementations MUST support setting the DSCP value in > >the outer IP Header of TRILL packets they send by mapping the TRILL > >priority and DEI to the DSCP. They MAY support, for a TRILL Data > >packet

Re: [trill] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10 - ECN & DSCP considerations

2017-07-01 Thread Black, David
priority and DEI does not appear to be consistent with RFC 7657 for TCP-based encapsulation. Thanks, --David > -Original Message- > From: Donald Eastlake [mailto:d3e...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 9:43 PM > To: Black, David > Cc: Magnus Westerlund ; tsv- > a.

Re: [trill] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10

2018-02-02 Thread Black, David
A couple of Diffserv-related follow-ups to Magnus’s comments: [1] > I don't really understand this change. Now you have priority 1 which points > to the proposed new mapping for > Lower than Best Effort, being the least prioritized. Then priority 0 intended > to be more prioritized is CS1 which

Re: [trill] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-10

2018-02-02 Thread Black, David
the normative reference to the le-phb draft does not suffice – the above text makes it clear to implementers that there is no DSCP that is (yet) appropriate to use for TRILL Priority 1. Thanks, --David From: Black, David Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 12:21 PM To: Magnus Westerlund ; Donald