Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 17:37:31 +0200 Pablo Correa Gomez wrote: > > PS: I've managed to find a workflow that is command line oriented > > and that doesn't require to run remote JavaScript code, at > > least for sending the patches in gitlab[1]. Though it's far > > from complete as you need to use the web interface to do > > the initial setup, fork the repository, etc. If one day I > > manage to get an almost full command line workflow with > > Gitlab, I'll document it somewhere. > Thank you for the changes and I am sure that somebody might appreciate > that documentation in the future! Ah for some reason it doesn't work here: > $ git push trisquel/GNUtoo HEAD:mr1 -o merge_request.create -o > merge_request.target=etiona fatal: the receiving end does not support > push options > $ git remote get-url trisquel/GNUtoo > [email protected]:GNUtoo/package-helpers I've tried it on another Gitlab instance (from a French community ISP) and it works there. In any case I sent the merge request for the etiona branch in gitlab[1] (I did it through the web interface this time). I'll let you handle the other Trisquel branches if applicable. References: --- [1]https://gitlab.trisquel.org/trisquel/package-helpers/-/merge_requests/505 Denis. pgppAk8H0WIGW.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 02:36 +0200, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > Hi again, > > I should normally have addressed all the concerns with the previous > version of the patches. > > On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:20:20 +0200 > Pablo Correa Gomez wrote: > > If you can access your account now, feel free > > to incorporate the feedback at the time of making the MRs. > > Otherwise, > > we could continue the discussion here. > I've chosen to send the v2 still on the mailing list as in this way > the > discussion won't be split accross two different systems. > > However I'll send the next patch series (if there are any) through > Gitlab. > > PS: I've managed to find a workflow that is command line oriented > and that doesn't require to run remote JavaScript code, at > least for sending the patches in gitlab[1]. Though it's far > from complete as you need to use the web interface to do > the initial setup, fork the repository, etc. If one day I > manage to get an almost full command line workflow with > Gitlab, I'll document it somewhere. Thank you for the changes and I am sure that somebody might appreciate that documentation in the future! > > References: > --- > [1]https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/push_options.html > > Denis. ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
Hi again, I should normally have addressed all the concerns with the previous version of the patches. On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:20:20 +0200 Pablo Correa Gomez wrote: > If you can access your account now, feel free > to incorporate the feedback at the time of making the MRs. Otherwise, > we could continue the discussion here. I've chosen to send the v2 still on the mailing list as in this way the discussion won't be split accross two different systems. However I'll send the next patch series (if there are any) through Gitlab. PS: I've managed to find a workflow that is command line oriented and that doesn't require to run remote JavaScript code, at least for sending the patches in gitlab[1]. Though it's far from complete as you need to use the web interface to do the initial setup, fork the repository, etc. If one day I manage to get an almost full command line workflow with Gitlab, I'll document it somewhere. References: --- [1]https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/push_options.html Denis. ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:40:38 +0200 David Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, Denis, sorry for the long delayed answe. > > Please confirm me the user name and e-mail address you'd like to use > in GitLab and I'll set up your account. username: GNUtoo e-mail: [email protected] Thanks a lot. Denis. pgpB6Ck03QUHE.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
Hi Denis, Sorry for the late reply. I'll leave some comments to the different patches that you sent. If you can access your account now, feel free to incorporate the feedback at the time of making the MRs. Otherwise, we could continue the discussion here. Best, Pablo (gnutastyc in the forum). On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:53 +0200, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > Hi, > > The documentation that can be found on Trisquel's website states that > we have to use gitlab to send patches, and since I don't have an > account there and that there is no way to create one, I was told on > IRC to wait for the next Trisquel dev meeting on Friday 26 November > and ask an account there. Unfortunately I wasn't able to attend that > meeting. > > I then went to the next meeting and someone there told me that pers > didn't have the access to create me an account, but that I could > send the patches to this mailing list instead. > > I hope that sending patches in this mailing list is fine. > > The "Fix proguard runtime with java pointing to Java 8" is a patch > that we need for building Replicant 6.0 with Trisquel 9. > > Before that we could only build Replicant 6.0 with Debian, and Debian > is not an FSDG compliant distribution. I already managed to build > images for several of the devices Replicant supports but I didn't > test > them yet on real hardware yet. For 3 devices we still need to fix the > build. > > Note that that patch is important but not very urgent to get in as I > already released modified proguard packages[1] in the meantime. > The released packages could also help with testing for people that > want or need to test that patch. > > Beside that I've some small documentation fixes and also a fix for > fai-server that looks important because if users install that package > they end up with an ubuntu /etc/apt/sources.list. > > References: > --- > [1] > https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/replicant/build-tools/proguard/26-08-2021/ > > Denis. > ___ > Trisquel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
Re: [Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
Hello, Denis, sorry for the long delayed answe. Please confirm me the user name and e-mail address you'd like to use in GitLab and I'll set up your account. Best regards, David R. El 3/9/21 a las 18:53, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli escribió: > Hi, > > The documentation that can be found on Trisquel's website states that > we have to use gitlab to send patches, and since I don't have an > account there and that there is no way to create one, I was told on > IRC to wait for the next Trisquel dev meeting on Friday 26 November > and ask an account there. Unfortunately I wasn't able to attend that > meeting. > > I then went to the next meeting and someone there told me that pers > didn't have the access to create me an account, but that I could > send the patches to this mailing list instead. > > I hope that sending patches in this mailing list is fine. > > The "Fix proguard runtime with java pointing to Java 8" is a patch > that we need for building Replicant 6.0 with Trisquel 9. > > Before that we could only build Replicant 6.0 with Debian, and Debian > is not an FSDG compliant distribution. I already managed to build > images for several of the devices Replicant supports but I didn't test > them yet on real hardware yet. For 3 devices we still need to fix the > build. > > Note that that patch is important but not very urgent to get in as I > already released modified proguard packages[1] in the meantime. > The released packages could also help with testing for people that > want or need to test that patch. > > Beside that I've some small documentation fixes and also a fix for > fai-server that looks important because if users install that package > they end up with an ubuntu /etc/apt/sources.list. > > References: > --- > [1]https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/replicant/build-tools/proguard/26-08-2021/ > > Denis. > ___ > Trisquel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
[Trisquel-devel] Patches for the etiona branch on package-helpers
Hi, The documentation that can be found on Trisquel's website states that we have to use gitlab to send patches, and since I don't have an account there and that there is no way to create one, I was told on IRC to wait for the next Trisquel dev meeting on Friday 26 November and ask an account there. Unfortunately I wasn't able to attend that meeting. I then went to the next meeting and someone there told me that pers didn't have the access to create me an account, but that I could send the patches to this mailing list instead. I hope that sending patches in this mailing list is fine. The "Fix proguard runtime with java pointing to Java 8" is a patch that we need for building Replicant 6.0 with Trisquel 9. Before that we could only build Replicant 6.0 with Debian, and Debian is not an FSDG compliant distribution. I already managed to build images for several of the devices Replicant supports but I didn't test them yet on real hardware yet. For 3 devices we still need to fix the build. Note that that patch is important but not very urgent to get in as I already released modified proguard packages[1] in the meantime. The released packages could also help with testing for people that want or need to test that patch. Beside that I've some small documentation fixes and also a fix for fai-server that looks important because if users install that package they end up with an ubuntu /etc/apt/sources.list. References: --- [1]https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/replicant/build-tools/proguard/26-08-2021/ Denis. ___ Trisquel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
