Hi DasFox,
I suggest you to launch gnome-appearance-properties from shell, then on the
Appearance Preference window try to enable Visual Effects and see the error
showed in the shell ...
I think that Canonical is trying to get rid of Gnome and open source
community and have its own desktop, exactly what Microsoft is doing for ages!
Canonical is a company as Microsoft, with developers to pay each month and is
trying to take a big piece of the UI cake to make money ... simply
I know, I'm not saying we should use Unity. What I'm saying is they make a
valid point in that people are coming to expect something other than
Microsoft's UI. Between Apple's iOS and Android and even Blackberry and
Symbian, a lot of people might be wooed if we give them a familiar
Yes, I agree! Unity is a valid point of starting using Pc in a different way
... but how many people know that there's a choice in the OS of his own PC?
We know that in our car whe can use different gas brand ... we cannot say the
same thing about the PC ...
MS pays a lot of money that endusers get Windows PCs. In normal stores, there
is always Windows pre installed. People believe that PCs are hard to build
(ok its sticking 5 things on one Big Thing). Its like BP says with other
companys gas you could only drive half as far. They Pay money that
You could try the latest gnash from my gnu ppa (i try to update this quite
often): https://launchpad.net/~dns/+archive/gnu
you just need to add my launchpad key:
sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 479B857B
and then this to your sources.list..
..if you have
Why wouldn't they package it? They package lots of trivial things that five
people use, but not this?
They already provide non-free unrar in multiverse. My guess is Ubuntu users
who want RARv3 support will probably either use that or use winrar through
wine.
If that's your argument, then why is Gnash packaged in Ubuntu?
Yea, it is pretty sad. I'm American, but I live in Mexico. My girlfriend goes
to UABC here. The teachers require work to be in .doc .xls and .ppt
The funny thing is, I don't even think the teachers have legitimate copies of
MS Office. It's all pirated. Their ignorance has them not only using
relax, time will tell
every PPA I've tried using errors out is there a fix for this? using 4.5
Damn, that is sad.
It comes from topic Big Changes Comings.
Yea, it is pretty sad. I'm American, but I live in Mexico. My girlfriend goes
to UABC here. The teachers require work to be in .doc .xls and .ppt
The funny thing is, I don't even think the teachers have legitimate copies of
MS Office. It's all
Yea, it is pretty sad. I'm American, but I live in Mexico. My girlfriend goes
to UABC here. The teachers require work to be in .doc .xls and .ppt
The funny thing is, I don't even think the teachers have legitimate copies of
MS Office. It's all pirated. Their ignorance has them not only
ignorance has them not only using proprietary formats when for their
uses free software and formats would work, but also pirating
software. This then in turn is basically a green light from
university faculty that the students should pirate the software too.
Students everywhere should stand
I've already fixed this, made a patch and sent it to quidam. I don't know
when it will be applied, but i hope it would be in the next version, if not
sooner.
use this install method in place of a ppa:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trisquel_On_A_Sugar_Toast#Install_Sugar-desktop_0.88_.22SWEETS.22
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Trisquel
pvalle...@gmail.com wrote:
every PPA I've tried using errors out is there a fix for this?
Sounds like getting the Debian 64 bit 38.x kernel will be the easiest for me.
I'm off to read Gdebi man page to give it a go.
@Ruben That sounds like an awesome slogan Come on guys, don't copy
that floppy! (copy ours!) or has someone already used it?
Don't copy that floppy was an awful anti sharing campaign from the 90s
I know, but the addition of Hey buddy, don't copy that floppy(copy ours!)
makes it awesome.
It should only be a matter of right-clicking on the DEB file and choosing
GDebi. Do not remove the other kernel... and please report here if this easy
solution actually works (the kernel is a sensible component)!
the 1st 3 should be removed/replaced yes, but hummm i wonder why it asks you
to remove the last 3 packages that u listed... you did not overwrite the
existing entries in the sources.list file or? and which trisquel version do
you use?
I want to bring this to everyone's attention that as a GNU Libre Linux user,
when possible I spread the word online.
I'm a member of the Wilders Security Forum, which happens to be an official
support forum of many big name software companies, so Wilders does get a
pretty big share of
24 matches
Mail list logo