Re: [Trisquel-users] Asus Eee PC 1001PX and Trisquel 5.5

2012-08-18 Thread tius
I can not access the virtual terminal, and nothing happens when I hit caps lock. :-(

Re: [Trisquel-users] Asus Eee PC 1001PX and Trisquel 5.5

2012-08-18 Thread alonivtsan
I'm guessing it's a problem with GDM (Gnome Display Manager). You could always install a different login manager like SLiM. Does grub2 show up? if so try using recovery mode or something similar which will give you a bare bones terminal to work with. If this doesn't work you can use a live

Re: [Trisquel-users] Netgear WN111-100NAR hardware versions and free drivers

2012-08-18 Thread tegskywalker
Well TP was my first place to look, but the n USB dongles are over $50 and I was looking for dongles that were free software and under $20.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu One

2012-08-18 Thread tegskywalker
Is Ubuntu One considered free software? Even if the client is, the server side stuff is proprietary, but that is considered ok right?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Netgear WN111-100NAR hardware versions and free drivers

2012-08-18 Thread chris
As I said before you aren't going to find one. There aren't any stocks anywhere still left. We are the last place to have any stock of any USB adapter with this chipset. I saw it coming a year or two (maybe more) ago. Unfortunately I didn't react quickly enough or we would have a cheaper

[Trisquel-users] Ubuntu One

2012-08-18 Thread Roberto Rodríguez
As I understand Ubuntu One es proprietary there for it wont be in the repositories.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Asus Eee PC 1001PX and Trisquel 5.5

2012-08-18 Thread tius
@ aloniv: I can do nothing, it's all hangs. Now I'd like to find a step by step guide to install Trisquell again.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Codecs MP3, AVI, MPEG etc.

2012-08-18 Thread tim
Since I am in the United States, does that mean I can't legally use Trisquel, because I haven't paid for a WMV, MPEG2, etc. license? Maybe Trisquel could ship without those codecs, so Americans can use it without being copyright infringing pirates :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu One

2012-08-18 Thread chris
Is there actually anything pointing to Ubuntu One client portion having a component that is non-free? I don't think this has ever been clearly answered here. I haven't seen anything to suggest it has any non-free dependencies that was reliable info. I haven't looked at the code though

Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu One

2012-08-18 Thread nathangnu
You sent your message before I started mine, but you touched on some of my thoughts. I think that either something went bizerk and excluded the packages, they were removed for using software as a service, or some other accident. I'm aware of the ethical issues with allowing a service to

Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu One

2012-08-18 Thread sirgrant
ubuntuone-client has in fact been [http://bzr.trisquel.info/ubuntu-purge/trunk/annotate/head:/purge-oneiric#L90 purged from Trisquel]. As for the justification behind that I can not provide an answer.