good post
--
[url=http://www.mrmrsweddingonline.com/]Wedding Dresses[/url]
[url=http://www.mrmrsweddingonline.com/bridesmaid-dresses_c843]birdesmaids
dresses[/url]
1) After bios details and before trisquel boot logo appear there some errors
that display every time when pc booting. from the day after i install
Trisquel.
Verifying DMI pool data... successful
error : out of disk
error : no suitable mode found
error : no video mode activated.
but after
Hello to you :D
This is the best I can do to help your for now.
*1*
Normally this error means that the ROMBIOS in your computer either
encountered an error trying to read the first sector from your hard drive or
did not find a valid boot signature on the first sector of the hard drive.
Nice :D I didn't knew that a free solution existed ! Just a curiosity.. it is
my or almost all of the Free Software is made (almost everything) by Spanish
(language not country) people ?
1) These are errors produced by the boot loader GRUB2. Here it is suggested
the first error is thanks to a buggy bios, and a possible workaround is
suggested. Another fix could be to update BIOS if available, but this is a
potentially dangerous operation.
Thanks. It's my first time Linux installed. Before that, in win7 there were
none errors. I think I should note about how I partitioned my disk. It's 40Gb
IDE HDD. MBR partition tabel. Primary 1Gb swap with boot flag. Rest in
Logical ext4 root. Is there any fault. Should I change to Guid
Those reference are perfect. Thanks.
I guess there is a bias here: Trisquel started in Spain. That is why Spanish
users are over-represented (nothing pejorative, just statistics!). They
obviously better know projects from Spain or for the Spanish language.
Wait...
Your boot flag is in the swap partition...?
Thanks. It's my first time Linux installed. Before that, in win7 there were
none errors.
One thing you'll learn is GNU/Linux won't hide any errors, unlike some legacy
OSes. The MBR scheme works and is I believe what most people use.
If you have a little extra spending money consider a contribution to the
following project. I donated $50 USD. Can you match or beat that? The goal is
to raise $60,000 to fund development for a year:
http://mediagoblin.org/pages/campaign.html
From the FSF:
Who hasn't gotten excited about a
Nice idea :D I would like to contribute but I only have 1,09$ on Paypal, and
since the minimum is 2$ I will have to wait a little bit :S...
It is good to see this, really ! At the opposite as we see in non-free
software projects, there is a really solidarity and everyone helps everyone
in
Yea. GNU Media Goblin means they are a officially part of the GNU project.
On 12/10/12 22:27, Alexander Stephen Thomas Ross wrote:
I think so or at least there providing support. You can find out. It's
probably on there mailing list.
On 12/10/12 22:24, tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
Did the
Trisquel is independent of the FSF just like ThinkPenguin is independent of
Trisquel. On the other hand there are relationships between FSF, Trisquel,
ThinkPenguin, and other projects/companies. Even Ubuntu, a distribution with
non-free enables Trisquel.
Trisquel does comply with FSF
Ranting and trolling on Trisquel mailing list and chatroom is a constant
in his writings. Possibly the best we can do is give him attention
because that is what he apparently seeks. I don't know how his childhood
was but problably the environment during those times had affected him in
ways he
The problem with Media Goblin is that due to it having a GPL license (AGPL
v3), it may not get the adoption it needs on a bigger scale with being used
by big organizations in addition to a community. Apache 2.0 would have been a
more wise option.
You should give more of an explanation.
pah I'll see about that. My biz in one sentence is a decent digital
video distributor. bye bye netflik, *rents, Amazon,etc. :) need to have
something to show. I am currently planing to use media goblin if it gets
bigger ought.
On 12/10/12 23:43, tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
The problem
Posts like this are unnecessary and counter productive.
I request this thread be removed or locked.
I (mostly) understand the idea of a Game Maker to use BSD or MIT license for
the libraries that will be used for the creation of the game letting all the
rest be GPLv3 (for example), giving the choice for uses to choose the license
they want for their final product (even if this allows
In deference to your sensibilities I've removed the post. However, if you
check the June 2012 mailing list archive you will find I was being entirely
factual.
You know there is no explanation. Just FUD.
For libraries, the GNU LGPL allows their use in proprietary software (but the
improvements to the library itself can only be distributed under the terms of
the same license). Now, someone who considers proprietary software as
unethical will choose the GPL for her library unless its features
El 12/10/12 18:40, and...@andrewlindley.co.uk escribió:
He did ask me, well y'know, to be intimate with him once. But none of
the acts he suggested were my kind of thing. However, I do know
people who are interested in that kind of thing and I'm beginning to
feel that I was being selfish not
yep
Yes, while I'm sure your right about his intentions there are different free
software licenses and the FSF does recommend different ones. The one he
mentions is the Apache 2 license and it is compatible with AGPL v3. Of course
that doesn't mean he is right although without more info...
I
The project was originally started in Spain at a Spanish university. Rubén
continued the project outside of university. At some point Richard Stallman
asked Rubén to move it to English. I'm unsure what the exact reason was
although I believe it had something to do with numbers and English
27 matches
Mail list logo
