[Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread blade . vp2020
hi Lazarus is a cross-platform visual integrated development environment (IDE) for rapid application development (RAD) using the Free Pascal compiler, which supports dialects of Object Pascal , to varying degrees. Software developers use Lazarus to create native-code console and

Re: [Trisquel-users] Free Driver for Ralink RT2790?

2014-07-24 Thread Andrew Lindley
Not generic firmware, this particular firmware. 1-2K GBP is sort of what a geenrous boss might offer in kind to an employee to 'rescue' that amount on their own time when the source has been lost. Yes, if you're actually paying commercial rate for it - no way. I guessed, perhaps wrongly,

Re: [Trisquel-users] Changing virtualbox with AQEMU

2014-07-24 Thread mikko . viinamaki
And starting with Trisquel 7 virtualbox will not be included as compiling it requires using a non-free compiler.

Re: [Trisquel-users] The free-whatever sect

2014-07-24 Thread andrew
Also often written as a warning. Do not feed.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread jason
The livestream will happen at http://www.openedjam.org/livestream Woot!

Re: [Trisquel-users] Ututo gnu linux

2014-07-24 Thread shiretoko
One has to mention that Ututo Gnu/Linux is based on Gentoo and afaik it uses the same package management system which compiles every single package from source before installing it - clearly a feature only some specific and advanced users want to have. Besides, it has been already mentioned

[Trisquel-users] Re : fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread magicbanana
What is the problem with the license? The Lazarus compiler is under the terms of the GNU GPL and the Lazarus Component Library is under the GNU LGPL. Lazarus actually is in Trisquel's repository. For instance, you can install it from Add/Remove Applications. If you are talking about the

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread blade . vp2020
fromWikipedia, the free encyclopedia Lazarus is free software . Different portions are distributed under different free software licenses , including GPL, LGPL, MPL , and a modified version of LGPL. [3] Specifically, the LCL, which is statically built into the produced executables, is

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread blade . vp2020
lcl

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread legimet . calc
What part of that makes it nonfree?

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread webmaster
Yes, I tried to install Lazarus from the Trisquel repos for serveral weeks ago. When I compile an application made in Lazarus, it can't find some of the libraries (I think it's the lcl's you're mentioning).

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread legimet . calc
LCL is just LGPL + extra permission to statically link with proprietary software. I don't see how that's nonfree.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread debianlinux
Woot!

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread gary02121993
Thanks!

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread davesamcdxv
Will it use SystemD?

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread shiretoko
I think it's a free software with a permissive touch. The fact that a piece of software is permissive might be a problem but it can't be solved by the users. Even if they make a new program out of it and license it under the gpl, the old version is still out there and can be used by

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread onpon4
It will use the same thing Ubuntu 14.04 uses, which I'm pretty sure is Upstart still. Ubuntu's plan is to migrate to systemd, though, so I guess Ubuntu 16.04, and therefore Trisquel 8, will probably use it.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread mmoeller
Could one please point out what that triskel thing is about? Is it a version based on KDE?

[Trisquel-users] Re : Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread mtlben
triskel is just a metapackage that will install a minimally functional KDE on top of your Trisquel install. Unfortunately, there is no triskel iso. I think that a netinstall with triskel + kde-full + kde-standard is the only way to get a pure and complete KDE Trisquel install.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread davesamcdxv
Never mind, I thought Systemd was in Trusty's default repos - from the looks of it, it actually isn't. My bad. So 2 years it officially is before I can do a systemd-nspawn again! :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread D. A. H.
The suggestion, below, should work; same goes for any other de (Mate, XFCE, pure GNOME, whatever). Maybe, get a basic net install (no de) working, first? On 07/24/2014 12:56 PM, mtlben wrote: Unfortunately, there is no triskel iso. I think that a netinstall with triskel + kde-full +

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread Teodorescu Petre
Fourtounately, there is a triskel 7 iso and hopefully will also be a image with the final release. http://devel.trisquel.info/makeiso/iso/ -- Teodorescu Petre trisquel.info | ceata.org | fsf.org | eff.org | riseup.net | airvpn.org | torproject.org | flattr.com |

Re: [Trisquel-users] When will I have support for my wireless? :( RT3290

2014-07-24 Thread arielxgbarton
But a lot of other hardware, even if not guarenteed to work, is compatible, and works fine.

Re: [Trisquel-users] fre version from lazarus

2014-07-24 Thread blade . vp2020
I Think we must make fre Branch from lazarus

Re: [Trisquel-users] My wifi card that isn't supported.

2014-07-24 Thread chris
I'm actually shocked how high your prices are! Your little adapter is 17x what I can get it for off eBay! [ everybody laugh ] I'm just trying to point out how silly this is. Prices a year ago were higher than they are today and we've dropped them accordingly. Obviously the product

Re: [Trisquel-users] My wifi card that isn't supported.

2014-07-24 Thread bob
You don't seem to care that much about free software since you are endorsing hardware that needs non-free blobs as seen here : https://tehnoetic.com/tehnoetic-wireless-adapter-gnu-linux-libre-tet-n150 If you are not aware, the raspberry PI is not a free software friendly device. Many of us

Re: [Trisquel-users] My wifi card that isn't supported.

2014-07-24 Thread bob
You don't seem to care that much about free software since you are endorsing hardware that needs non-free blobs as seen here : https://tehnoetic.com/tehnoetic-wireless-adapter-gnu-linux-libre-tet-n150 If you are not aware, the raspberry PI is not a free software friendly device. Many of us

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Seven!!!

2014-07-24 Thread bob
I will be watching too! I've been using Trisquel 7 since March and I'm quite happy with it. I've been using it for the building and development of libreCMC.

Re: [Trisquel-users] My wifi card that isn't supported.

2014-07-24 Thread legimet . calc
http://www.raspberrypi.org/a-birthday-present-from-broadcom/

Re: [Trisquel-users] When will I have support for my wireless? :( RT3290

2014-07-24 Thread chris
Chipsets have what I'd refer to as a life span. The other reason they change chipsets is because of costs. Companies find ways to cut corners and a newer chipset that is basically identical can be cheaper to produce. It may be the same company that they used before, but a newer chipset, or a

Re: [Trisquel-users] My wifi card that isn't supported.

2014-07-24 Thread bob
You apparently did not read the post, did you? : ...VideoCore IV is the first publicly documented mobile graphics core, and hope this is the first step towards a blob-free future for Raspberry Pi... The PI still needs a non-free blob to boot. I don't care about the graphics stack. If it

[Trisquel-users] I might install Mint 17 in Vbox if I can't print.

2014-07-24 Thread gary02121993
I've just plugged my printer and I know my PC knows it's been plugged. I can't see it via lsblk, some other commands I could use? I'll manually add it via USB id or something similar.

[Trisquel-users] Which is better as per privacy and security?

2014-07-24 Thread gary02121993
Tor (64-bit browser bundle) or Abrowser with Adblock Plus and Privacy Badger (EFF)?