Hm I see.
I can't remember exactly if all keyboard shortcuts became irresponsible
when the Ibus bug happens, but that indeed seems to be a different problem.
Yes I know, coreboot can integrate blobs, and it does for Intel i series.
Oh, wow.
I think that means it's restricted with Adobe Reader's DRM. You should
complain about that file; there's no way to see it.
According to EFF, "The Senate just voted to roll back your online privacy
protections":
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/03/senate-puts-isp-profits-over-your-privacy
Arstechnica also wrote about this: "The US Senate today voted to eliminate
broadband privacy rules that would have required
>also, why does he have a picture of stallman on his user account?
he is nowhere near the type of person who should have a picture of stallman.
>
>well, I checked seamonkey's security compared to firefox, on panoptclick and
jondofox, it is kind of embarrassing how easily it gets tracked.
meh... not sure why.
>
Fingerprinting has nothing to do with "security".
My Seamonkey has the same fingerprint of my TorBB. Just fake the useragent
> and flashed Coreboot/Libreboot.
This is a confusing statement, and it's not very important, because Coreboot
on modern Intel processors is just a shim for proprietary initialization
blobs. It might be about as important as using a libre implementation of the
ls command on Mac OS X. Very
I have donated money before to be honest its been like 25$ at least.
not that its much... but its better than nothing. heh.
That makes sense actually... what a pity.
You should not care about it, you can install OS you want, blobbed or not.
The important thing is neutralize ME (and other Intel's malware/bloatware)
and flashed Coreboot/Libreboot.
Pretty simple, really: not very many people use SeaMonkey.
Well, coreboot and libreboot both said that purism is not what they are
interested in despite the fact they called themselves "purism"
personally, I don't think they have a clue how much of an uphill battle they
would have to make it blob free. But I also think they are selling tainted
well, I checked seamonkey's security compared to firefox, on panoptclick and
jondofox, it is kind of embarrassing how easily it gets tracked.
meh... not sure why.
Why don't they use Trisquel? Why did they insist on further dividing the
community with their own OS?
As the FSF says, https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
"If you wish to improve the state of free distros, helping to develop an
existing free distro contributes more than starting
Wow fkng great!! thanks for the information.
15 matches
Mail list logo
