> thought that the VeraCrypt people had cleaned up TrueCrypt.
https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/VeraCrypt%20License.html
It is probably the truecrypt license part which stops
veracrypt from getting free software.
Still you got the veracrypt source code.
https://www.veracrypt.fr/code/
Which has been
Thanks for your replies! That is a relief. I thought for a moment that
Trisquel was using binary packages from Ubuntu.
Right. Some programs need to be modified and the Helpers do that so that: The
kernel needs to have blobs removed, Firefox needs to be rebranded into
Abrowser (along with privacy changes made), Ubuntu branding needs to be
changed, and more. In this way a person doesn't need to do these tasks
There may be a slight misunderstanding. That's not quite what I was
mentioning. Let's back up for a moment to what nadebula.1984 said.
nadebula.1984's original statement that I was responding to about was exactly
this: "I can publish a GNU GPL v3-or-Later licensed free/libre software, but
As far as I understand, the Trisquel project builds all the binary packages
it distributes from source. A "helper" may modify the source of a package
(typically to solve a freedom issue) but most packages are built from their
unmodified sources the Trisquel project gets from Ubuntu (because
I believe you are talking about different points and that you are both right.
The common part of your scenarios is "Alice develops a program; she
distributes a copy of it to Bob, under the term of a free software license;
she does not like Carol."
nadebula.1984 says Alice does not have to
How Trisquel is developed? I read the link under documents (about Trisquel
development) but there is something that’s not quite clear to me. According
to README.md in the package-helpers packages are build from source;
“This set of scripts are helpers that modify and create the source
You decide your refusals.
Microsoft/Github decide their refusals.
What freedoms decide Trisquel project to deny or restrict?
(not only on software code context but also on participation)
El 31/7/19 a les 5:13, xliang9...@live.cn ha escrit:
> I don't violate Freedom 0 if I deny someone to access
notabug.org service uses gogs.io software
framagit.org service uses gitlab.com software
El 31/7/19 a les 3:09, e...@disroot.org ha escrit:
> https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/issues/236
>
> I think it would be a better option using https://framagit.org
I missed it is about the t400s.
10 matches
Mail list logo
