Como hago para no recibir más mensajes de este grupo, ya no soy usuario de Trisquel.
Gracias. El 19/04/2013 20:48, "Andrew Roffey" <andrew.rof...@connect.qut.edu.au> escribió: > I was curious. Mozilla Firefox is not considered free software >> because it has some proprietary things concerning logos, correct? >> > > Yes, it is the trademark policy that is problematic: > https://lists.nongnu.org/**archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/** > 2011-08/msg00014.html<https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2011-08/msg00014.html> > https://www.mozilla.org/**foundation/trademarks/policy.**html<https://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html> > > Mozilla previously had non-free copyright licensing on their logos, but > that was fixed a few years ago. > > I would assume this was true also for Mozilla Seamonkey? I am asking >> because frankly I despise Firefox-type browsers. I like Seamonkey >> and all it has to offer, built-in e-mail for one. >> > > Yes, I believe so: > https://www.mozilla.org/**foundation/trademarks/list.**html<https://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/list.html> > > Are there any truly free alternatives to Seamonkey (if it isn't free >> itself) >> > > There is Iceape on Debian, but it still /recommends/ proprietary > software through the extension manager. For Trisquel, there aren't any > at the moment. > > Also, why does Firefox come up in the Synaptic Repository if it is >> not free? >> > > It is a package which installed "Abrowser", the patched unbranded copy > of Firefox with some other modifications. For example, it doesn't > recommend proprietary software. > > Andrew. > >
