You can also try Tor, and set the settings to Safest, it is also based on
Firefox esr(8.5.4 (based on Mozilla Firefox 60.8.0esr) (64-bit)).
And you can install libreJs addon.
I'll have surf with it again and take notes on the pages. The last time I
used it, e-mail, shopping, and a few casual pages (news, etc.) had issues,
and yes, I believe it had to do with LibreJS. Iirc, I attempted to disable
it, and javascript was still disabled, for some reason. I'm
> IceCat, while I'm a huge fan of the concept, doesn't work on most
> pages that I want to look at. It's basically a slightly more graphical
> version of ELinks.
Icecat is definitely much more than a graphical version of elinks. It is
as capable of rendering pages as Firefox ESR. The reason why
I've set Abrowser as my default. Once I hardened it (per my thread here:
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/privacy-and-security-configuration-setting-abrowser),
it's been a great browser - very private, and very secure. IceCat, while I'm
a huge fan of the concept, doesn't work on most pages
I usually setup IceCat because it's binary distributed for more
GNU/Linux distros, and my customizations work in more scenarios.
El 10/7/19 a les 1:29, s...@disroot.org ha escrit:
> Looking for anyone's opinion here. Here we have an OS that's certified
> by the FSF and GnuProject and it's native
The version in the Trisquel repos is 52.3.0 and noscript is not compatible
with it. Noscript requires verion 59 and above.
> Indeed. But currently I am using Abrowser because NoScript is currently
> not available to IceCat (because of the version I think).
What version of Icecat are you running? I'm using NoScript with Icecat
60.7 with no problems.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Actually I always wanted to have both Abrowser and Icecat on the latest
version in Trisquel since the icecat in the repos is very old though I guess
we can see Abrowser as the up to Firefox version and icecat is in a LTS (or
at least that's the way I see it).
Indeed. But currently I am using Abrowser because NoScript is currently not
available to IceCat (because of the version I think). And personally I find
NoScript to be such an interesting addon.
The optimal would be IceCat's focus on guiding the user paired with
Abrowser's version.
I have to agree with you that Abrowser does not have LibreJS by default.
There are also a few more extensions that icecat is featuring. I guess there
is nothing that you could not install in Abrowser if you know what you want.
I have to say that Icecat helps on setting you up for a free
Looking for anyone's opinion here. Here we have an OS that's certified by the
FSF and GnuProject and it's native browser vs the FSF and GnuProject's own
browser.
So freedom-wise they should be in the exact same landscape.
But what about other areas like performance, features, design (highly
11 matches
Mail list logo
