nicolasm...@tutanota.com wrote:
Apple: Work for us for free!
Sadly this could very well be the case, and those who fall for the open
source story (remember, so far nothing has been released under an
OSI-approved license yet) will not be given a reason for Apple's choice.
I think Brad Kuhn
It's not like we lack programming languages. :)
You can say that again :P
Apple: Work for us for free!
http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/what-does-apple-get-out-of-taking-swift-open-source/
http://readwrite.com/2015/06/09/apple-swift-open-source-wwdc2015
http://www.engadget.com/2015/06/08/swift-open-source/
As you may or may not know, Swift is a new programming language set to
replace
The articles don't mention what is going to be open source (a compiler, a
debugger, an IDE, an implementation of the standard library, or what else?).
As usual, those who talk about open source don't know what the term means and
misapply it. Open source is a property that software may
GNUstep's position on Swift
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com.es/2014/06/gnusteps-position-on-swift.html
