I agree FREE software is even more important in this day and age and I'm all in
100% using and promoting FREE/GNU software and trying to convert people.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:23 PM, wrote:
> Considering what
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I am to the point of disagreeing that all software is
beneficial if it is Free Software, because some Free Software is being
created to further the efforts of the proprietary enslavement of the general
users. For instance, Chromium and Chrome
Chromium is not free
The whole point of Trisquel is to be a 100% libre Debian.
Running it in WSL defeats the point. Though I would find it amusing if
ReactOS implemented a WSL (or would it be an RSL in this case?) Having a
libre NT isn't a bad idea, I suppose you could in theory run 100% libre code
on ReactOS.
On 9/4/19, ja...@bluehome.net wrote:
> Bradley Kuhn has been talking about the problem of corporate cooption for
> some years now.
>
> https://invidio.us/watch?v=aUy3uVvVsrU
>
> http://ebb.org/bkuhn/talks/OpenSym-2016/politics.html
>
> It's good to go look up his various talks and listen to them.
Bradley Kuhn has been talking about the problem of corporate cooption for
some years now.
https://invidio.us/watch?v=aUy3uVvVsrU
http://ebb.org/bkuhn/talks/OpenSym-2016/politics.html
It's good to go look up his various talks and listen to them.
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I am to the point of disagreeing that all software
> is beneficial if it is Free Software, because some Free Software is being
> created to further the efforts of proprietary project. For instance,
> Chromium and Chrome. The Chromium project helps promote the enslavement
>
Considering what Micro$oft has been doing to "Linux" lately through their
"Micro$oft loves Linux" campaign, their takeover of Github and the Linux
Foundation, I don't think that Trisquel or any Free Software project should
help in legitimizing Micro$oft anymore than it has been done in the
That was my point. :)
+1
El 2/9/19 a les 1:36, calmst...@posteo.de ha escrit:
> wouldn't want to give legitimacy to Windows or Azure
For those who (temporarily) cannot completely get rid of Losedows, we can
allow them to run part of GNU on Losedows. The FSF official site maintains a
list of free/libre software for Losedows. See
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Collection:Windows
For Losedows victims, I suggest that they
That really wasn't what I meant... I meant Stallman wouldn't want to give
legitimacy to Windows or Azure.
Although, you may have a point regardless, maybe this would be a good idea...
hmm...
Would microsoft block people from using Trisquel in Azure though?
hmm...
Maybe, although
Even then, I don't think Stallman or the trisquel developers would want that.
If Microsoft became fully free software and had no propreitary components
which is a very crazy stretch of the imagination...
Then yes, Trisquel developers would be willing I bet.
Again, that's a
On 01/09/19 08:33, Егор Гаврилов wrote:
> Trisquel developers will make a WSL and Azure version of Trisquel?
I am not a Trisquel developer, but the answer is obvious:
For WSL: Never, unless Windows NT became Free Software.
For Azure: Never, unless Azure became Free Software.
--
Ignacio
Trisquel developers will make a WSL and Azure version of Trisquel?
14 matches
Mail list logo
