Yeah, just don't expect privacy.
And having said that there are a lot of uses in which on is fine without it,
just like how CCTVs might not be in one's house, but the police have a right
to put them in public places. The important thing is users have the right to
privately store it and
What's wrong with this:
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/server
And then building from this platform up?
Can you explain what a 'docker container' is? Never heard of it.
http://www.docker.com/whatisdocker/
There are containers for Ubuntu and would be nice for Trisquel as well.
I would never use cloud services for my personal files, but I see the value
for web sites that may benefit from potential scalability.
I swear most of you free software evangelists are stuck in your ways with
viewpoints that are over a decade old.
Like time-sharing and main frame computers?
What is wrong with deploying a Docker container on a hosting company if you
have total control of that container?
The point is you
Well, someone has to host it as most ISPs will not allow you to host a
website from your home.
A self-hosted cloud isn't the same as a self-hosted website since you're the
only one accessing it from outside and hence traffic is lower. Most isp allow
it i guess.
The real problem is that it's a pain in the neck setting it up und
maintaining the cloud in a secure way.
You have enough
I agree with fr33dom,
We should shy away from cloud-based computing because by promoting it, we are
promoting the control over others. Setting up one's own server and own
personal cloud is a way to fight this.
Peace,
grimlok
I swear most of you free software evangelists are stuck in your ways with
viewpoints that are over a decade old. What is wrong with deploying a Docker
container on a hosting company if you have total control of that container?
I don't think people need help (i.e. hosting companies) putting their e-mail,
photos, videos, calendars, address books, messages, documents (and whatever
else they might put on their server) to third parties. The Internet-using
public already seems exceedingly efficient at doing that.
Trisquel at this point is pretty much a desktop only OS that cleans out the
Ubuntu install and changes around some packages while blacklisting others.
Its nice to have a libre desktop and all, but the developers should take the
server space more seriously too.
I'm talking maybe a server
Good for you. I can do the same thing, but hosting places want autonomy and
simplicity with a pre-built image.
On 2014-11-12
tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
Good for you. I can do the same thing, but hosting places want autonomy and
simplicity with a pre-built image.
That's exactly why we have our own home servers - we can control what we put
there. Ruben already does a lot of work, I wouldn't add
14 matches
Mail list logo
