Viejito, I am terribly sorry for that and will make sure it'll never happen
again. X_X
SuperTramp83
You are taking my trolling moment of glory away with your statement.
Don't worry much, mate - it's not a biggie if you put it here. It's just that
as far as I understand, it is a good practice to put anything that is not
directly related to free software in the Troll Hole.
Have a nice day.
Sorry, didn't mean to stir anything up.
Should I have just put this in the Troll Hole?
I want to spare Jodiendo the trouble: OP, this goes in the troll hole.
Ars Technica has an article on this.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/first-came-the-breathalyzer-now-meet-the-roadside-police-textalyzer/
It's another excuse to search your belongings. Failure to comply could cost
you your license.
Stallman discussed this on his personal site back on 4/22/16:
https://www.stallman.org/archives/2016-jan-apr.html
"The idea of a tool to determine whether a driver's phone was used for text
messaging at the time of an accident is fine in principle, but it is almost
impossible in practice
This guy is just clueless. There are so many things wrong with his idea:
* You can't get records of texting without cooperation by the phone's
operating system. This includes both keeping the necessary records, and
supporting whatever signals this hypothetical device sends, then actually
http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/04/27/474980140/new-york-wants-to-know-have-you-been-texting-and-driving
No thanks.
My thoughts:
1.)This may sound rough, but lieberman's son should have, if he didn't
already then i guess it didn't work, told his pal who was driving to
