[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-24 Thread lcerf
Thank you for the excellent news.

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-24 Thread lcerf
The version APT proposes on my Trisquel 8 system is 3.5.18-1-ubuntu1+8.0trisquel1. Is it because I have enabled backports? There is no such backport in xenial-backports. In bionic-updates, the version is 3.5.18-1ubuntu1.4, which indeed looks more recent than the one APT proposes me.

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-23 Thread lcerf
If the package does not require recent versions of its dependencies, it can be installed on an older distribution. Downloading the package on https://packages.debian.org/buster/amd64/timeshift/download and double-clicking on it, GDebi, which is installed by default, tells some dependency

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-23 Thread lcerf
triskel and trisquel (notice the spelling difference) provide different sets of default packages. Mainly, triskel comes with the KDE desktop environment and trisquel with the MATE desktop environment. You can have the full list of packages in any ISO by reading the file with the same URL

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-22 Thread lcerf
That would be there: https://trisquel.info/node/add/project-issue/trisquel It would help to discover whether the bug still exists on Trisquel 9, trying to install libgnutls-dev on the live system: http://jenkins.trisquel.info/makeiso-etiona/iso/ If the bug does not exist anymore, it is

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-20 Thread lcerf
The same happen if I try to install libgnutls-dev on my system. It looks like a bug...

[Trisquel-users] Re : System backup snapshots

2020-07-19 Thread lcerf
I would try to install the libvte-2.91-dev package.