Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread tomlukeywood
is there a source on this image?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread vfvs
https://github.com/CommunityCube/debian-autoscript but I haven't checked deeply.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread jadedml
It's on the IndieGoGo project. https://ksr-ugc.imgix.net/assets/003/744/684/b1863c61b126f317c1b03d3c391f921e_original.jpg?v=1430952891=700==max=format=92=77e2c58e057fb029ba4ab213db8242c2

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread jadedml
The infographic is trying to say that "Files & docs" are priceless, not that they're worthless.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread tomlukeywood
i should of said is there a source for the data on the image?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-21 Thread moxalt
Actually unvaluable should just be 'not valuable' or something along those lines. 'Invaluable' means the same thing as valuable (although with a meaning more along the lines of 'indispensable'), in the same way that inflammable means the same thing as flammable.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-20 Thread jadedml
There have been fifty-bazillion of these freaking little turn-on-and-done cube servers on KickStarter over the past few months, and all of them have some non-free components, or some iffy areas. TL;DR You're better off using your desktop as a server.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-20 Thread vfvs
I'm quite sure that the server I will self-made will have much more non-free components than this one. JadedCtrl have you checked or are you talking generically about these kind of projects ? Because It will be bad to judge something that could be the freest thing we could have for now,

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-20 Thread chris
"Community Cube uses the boards ODROID-XU3 Lite from Hardkernel, which is 99% open, and you can run any Linux based operating system on it. " and "which is 99% open". I think that speaks for itself. No, it's not "open" / free. It's dependent on proprietary bits (I believe a bootloader in

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-20 Thread jadedml
Either they don't understand how US currency works or they missed a few zeroes to make the numbers thousands... And unvaluable should be *invaluable...

Re: [Trisquel-users] Safety of CommunityCube

2015-09-20 Thread jadedml
I was speaking in general. 9 time out of 10 if a hardware project says it's "completely open" or "fully FOSS," it's just open-washing. Turns out that guess was right, though, according to Chris'es comment.