Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-18 Thread tr33hugger
I watched the same youtube video using windows then my Linux machine, the video was 52 mins; Win 7 = 709.4 MB Linux Trisquel = 417.17 MB The Windows machine has a faster processor and more RAM, the Linux machine has Trisquel and a small SSD. Trisquel wins.

Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-17 Thread tr33hugger
The Win7 pro machine has been running the same copy of windows for 9 years. Since 2016 have been following Woodys group B security only updates. (woody on windows) Automatic updates are turned off. The only 3rd party prog running is netmeter. 160 GB 5400rpm HD on the win 7 X200. I swap the

Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-16 Thread gnuser
For what it's worth, 10 years ago I was running my old laptop with Windows 7. Using 3g internet, I would usually get 3Mbps. When I started using Ubuntu 10.04, I noticed my speeds would get about 7Mbps. I even called my ISP to ask if this could be related to any illegal access my "linux

Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-16 Thread centurino
Size of a video is determined by a lot of factors like resolution, algorithms used to compress the video, how dynamic it is, etc. Still, that difference is huge. Maybe Windows was downloading updates in the background? The support for 7 is technically over, but it might still try to get

Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-16 Thread tr33hugger
It was two different videos. One was recorded with skype (UK), the other recorded from a mobile internet live stream platform (US). I just assumed youtube was the same for all videos. Silly me.

Re: [Trisquel-users] youtube download difference

2020-05-16 Thread xliang9550
Have you been watch the same video using Losedows and GNU/Linux respectively? If not, we can't draw any conclusion. Because different video clips may have very different coding parameters.