Re: [Trisquel-users] non-free sw on websites

2014-12-30 Thread t8mf4nu6lizp
Obviously the worst thing about proprietary JavaScript is that it's proprietary. You don't have the 4 freedoms. Besides that JavaScript can be used for snooping various things, some listed at https://panopticlick.eff.org/ Also, the JavaScript sandboxes on many applications are not too good

Re: [Trisquel-users] non-free sw on websites

2014-12-30 Thread Andrew Roffey
I posted my IMO on harmful effects of non-free JavaScript here: https://trisquel.info/en/forum/harmful-effects-non-free-javascript tl;dr: tricking users, unnecessarily tracking of user actions on pages, obfuscation or primitive digital restrictions management (hard to tell, not sure what

[Trisquel-users] Trisquel Asia Mirror : in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ is not responding/working ?

2014-12-30 Thread pandyadeepp
I'm living in India and using mirror in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ since I installed Trisquel 7.0 LTS. But for a week; This mirror is not answering. I can't : Neither sudo apt-get update Nor sudo apt-get install [pkg] I've also checked by trying to download package(s) manually from

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riftyful
Maybe release the source code? What you're trying to do is nice, but it does seem strange to me. If you're trying to make a fully free system, it would be logical for you to develop and share it as free software. But you say that you only provide a non-functional binary .iso without the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Asia Mirror : in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ is not responding/working ?

2014-12-30 Thread Andrew Roffey
Hence Why in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ is not active (since about week)? Is it dead? Yes, I think it must have died recently because I only started having issues a few weeks ago (for some reason the installer must have defaulted to India). You should change to one of the archives listed

[Trisquel-users] Is packages.trisquel.info is down/dead?

2014-12-30 Thread pandyadeepp
Recently I observed (for two days) that I can't open http://packages.trisquel.info/ also checked from external sites (to see that http://packages.trisquel.info/ is not down for me or really down) which also results that http://packages.trisquel.info/ is down/dead. Then Why

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Asia Mirror : in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ is not responding/working ?

2014-12-30 Thread pandyadeepp
OK. I replaced in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ with http://mirror.fsf.org/trisquel (in /etc/apt/sources.list) and now All working fine. BTW https://trisquel.info/en/forum/packagestrisquelinfo-downdead

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel Asia Mirror : in.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ is not responding/working ?

2014-12-30 Thread Sachin
It is hosted by http://kmeacollege.ac.in/ some of their services have been down for a while

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is packages.trisquel.info is down/dead?

2014-12-30 Thread t8mf4nu6lizp
You can useapt-cache search QUERYfor searching the descriptions of packages andapt-cache search -n QUERY for searching package names.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is packages.trisquel.info is down/dead?

2014-12-30 Thread ruben
The development server is being migrated to a new machine, service will be restored soon.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Is packages.trisquel.info is down/dead?

2014-12-30 Thread andrew
Personally, I've been pretty much off the air since 12/25, however, at that time the 'backend' of the new build system was undergoing tests. That is the part which delivers signed binaries of Trisquelized packages to the repo. There is also a bug against packages.trisquel.info for it not

Re: [Trisquel-users] X60 Temps

2014-12-30 Thread andrew
I bought myself a dinky TV dinner tray to put my Libreboot X60s on for Christmas. Since then the ventilation holes at the bottom have been left in the clear I haven't had an overheat. I'm not running thinkfan, but am running last stable Libreboot rather than any from the current beta

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
As much as I would love to release the source code early, if I did, there would be nothing to sell! Also, it wouldn't add much additional proof of the software's existence. The FSF supports selling free software - the GPL was designed with this in mind:

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread blade . vp2020
Read the article correctly The article says selling free software and The free software must possess the four freedoms You violated the four freedoms you say that you only provide a non-functional binary .iso without the source code and sell a DVD with working one you ask people not to

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
The people who receive the software have the freedom to distribute it. All I am doing, is requesting on a human level that they wait a bit before doing so. They can disregard my request if they want to. I didn't want to distribute the cd56.iso without source, but many people were

Re: [Trisquel-users] non-free sw on websites

2014-12-30 Thread joseph . e . dickson
I think of it this way, Facebook and I presume Google track users when they're logged out and not even on their sites through all sorts of code that we can't see or opt out of. http://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-we-do-track-logged-out-users-but-trust-us/#!

Re: [Trisquel-users] trisquel support for 2 video cards and 3 monitors

2014-12-30 Thread tomlukeywood
i have no experiance with multiple monitors but i do know that very few modern video cards work well with free software you can get a good one that will work with trisquel from thinkpenguin though:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Text to speech for gnulinux?

2014-12-30 Thread svhaab
Thank you. I recognize some of the links stated in the answers. The quality of espeak and festival voices I have installed or tested, is not high enough. I am impressed of the quality of windows voice anna. On the internet there was, and maybe still is, some windows sapi5 voices. Fx

[Trisquel-users] stallman's speech

2014-12-30 Thread maestro
Really enjoyed this speec the last night - I didn't see it before on minitube so I guess is quite recent.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mOIAY_Jmw cheers

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread marioxcc . MT
It's hard to do business with unknown people. That's the case here from possible donnors/patrons to Riley and vice-versa. It's much easier if there's a trusted intermediary. Riley Baird: I'm very glad that you're interested in free software. I support commercial development of free

Re: [Trisquel-users] non-free sw on websites

2014-12-30 Thread mail
Thanks for the great essay- I'm now convinced that I should keep LibreJS enabled.

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread mail
orthogonal released the cd56.iso- I did a quick comparison of OpenBSD's ISO and LibertyBSD's ISO: LibertyBSD: 8.0 MB in size OpenBSD: 8.8 MB in size That's all the comparison that's possible without the source code.

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
It seems most likely that the blobs are the only things which would be large enough to account for this much of a difference in size. Since you're already buying a CD, I'll email you a link to the source tarballs now, if you'd like to do any more comparison. (They're several hundred

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
Thank you so much for going to all of this work to make this proposal. This is definitely something which I would like to do. *I've removed the cd56.iso from the website. If anyone is looking for it, and still wants it, feel free to ask. *Would the FSF be willing to act as an escrow? I

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread onpon4
You can't rely entirely on OpenBSD's policy. Note this passage: It follows however, that OpenBSD cannot include material which includes copyrights which are more restrictive than the Berkeley copyright, or must relegate this material to a secondary status, i.e. OpenBSD as a whole is freely

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
Okay, good point about the policy. As far as I can tell, there is no more non-free software in OpenBSD (other than the firmware blobs). If any more is found, I'll be sure to remove it. I don't think that it's worth refusing to help OpenBSD just because of their license choice. After all -

Re: [Trisquel-users] LibertyBSD - OpenBSD minus the blobs

2014-12-30 Thread riley
I've just heard that some people are unable to donate/buy CDs because they don't have a Bitcoin wallet, so I've included instructions on how to pay using Paypal or credit card: http://www.libertybsd.net/#nobitcoin I've also contacted the FSF to ask about escrow, so hopefully that will work.