Well, viruses do not threaten GNU/Linux much (because it has less users,
because its users tend not to run as root, not to install software in e-mail
attachments, etc.). ClamAV can be installed but it almost exclusively
targets Windows viruses. It makes sense to use it on an email server
See with 'lsusb' whether the chipset is really AR9170.
Hello, I was wondering if anyone can recommend any good anti virus programs
that would work well with Trisquel and Libreboot? Or,...is there a point to
have antivirus software with this setup?
I think that it should be advertised more the fact that intel ME can be
removed also on recent hardware. Speaking of Blobs, the storage as well has
its own firmware and so on. And this is still there even in the librebooted
laptops. Many people install the most recent ssd on those laptop and
I'm not really liking the vibe of that conversation. It seems to be asserting
that a "minimized" ME plus Coreboot is the same or really close to Libreboot
as if the ME is the only issue. This is clearly not true since Coreboot
itself is not libre software and has its own blobs. Libreboot is
Thank you.
I just can't bring myself to install Mint, but my peeps may well be a lot
more vulnerable than your peeps, ergo my (sometimes ever verging on
irrational) passion for Trisquello, despite my blase ho hum irreverent
attitude towards the achievements of the illustrious Senor
with
$ nmcli d wifi list
i can see the available WiFi hotspots
but the connection command
$ nmcli d wifi connect WiFiSSID password WiFiPassword iface WifiInterface
gives me
$ connection activation failed: secrets were required but not provided
didnt found anything helpful for this error
>I never particularly liked Linux Mint
As much as I'd dislike having in it on a computer that I own (not gonna
happen) even more so I like it installed on a mate's computer: it really is
the only distro my semi-illiterate mates NEVER have any issue, give credit
where it's due..
Jodiendo said: I'm 100 percent full blooded American.
I said: I am so sorry. I am not the praying type, but my thoughts are with
you in your time of trouble. Please let me know if there is anything I can do
to help ease your suffering.
Supertramp83 said: As I've said elsewhere, my beef
Hi gd_scandia,
I remember doing that. I never particularly liked Linux Mint, but I did a
bunch of small newbie friendly distros like Simply Mepis, LXLE, AntiX, etc.
on VMs whenever I got frustrated by all the trolls on the Trisquel boards my
first year or so in the community.
I guess it
I bought the Netgear WN111v2 and according to
https://h-node.org/wifi/view/en/1492 it should work with free software only.
But it seems that i have to install additional software, which i cant because
i have no net access. Any ideas? How can i install this device?
An additional problem is
"Suspectedly" is not a word, so that doesn't help at all. What do you mean by
"suspectedly written"?
> Of course you cant relicense their binaries, but if they are the sources?
No difference. It's still copyrighted. Copyright works on all works, not just
compiled binaries.
> unless this
That doesn't make sense to me either. What are you talking about?
My problem is that Noscript isn't working properly anymore. The interface at
the bottom of the browser doesn't show. First Javascript was blocked
completely, and after i switched Noscript off an on scripts are accepted
automatically. Although i can see the Noscript settings and they haven't
I am speaking about the hardware I have available and that it is already 3
years old. I am just telling a fact. No support for my nvidia card without
firmware in nouveau.
We are living in a world far from ideal. I am not blaming the people that
wrote nouveau.
This fact will push me to use an
Since when was kepler not modern though?
(maxwell and up...fair enough. That and it's Nvidia that's not supporting it,
not the other way around. long story)
CalmStorm
I could help you! but before we start, allow me to ask you? Are you
installing into a laptop or desktop? and what version of fsf parabola and
about devuan? normally I do install them individually, I wont spend my time
on the encryption of the hard drive, Ill worry about it after
SuperTramp83 said:
>As I've said elsewhere, my beef with Purism is mostly their name.
It really not pure, and damn sure it ain't librem
I'm a 100 percent pure, 24karat cold gold, full American blooded
homo-sapiens, only liquid gold flows through my veins. Yes I'm not a follower
of
"Licenses which are suspectedly written".
Of course you cant relicense their binaries, but if they are the sources?
Sources mean where you make a derivative, of course you are free to license
you this work under GPL, unless this is prohibited against the original
license.
"Taking denials against one" is antonym against "taking credits for him".
20 matches
Mail list logo
