Erm, why? What does use of a mailing list have to do with Usenet?
Actually, I don't even get why you want to go back to using Usenet in the
first place. I've never been exposed to newsgroups outside of archives like
Google Groups, so I don't know personally what it's like, but I am not aware
しんぱいしないでください。いつも何も言わなくてもいいです。それから、他人は話を続けてもいいですね。何もスレを始めた人のせいではありません。ボスではないのですね。
There's no need to announce that you're not continuing. You can respond or
not respond to messages as you wish; you don't gain any obligations simply
because you started a thread. Please be at ease and don't
Well... that has already been done, so I don't see why not. Let's not forget
that they attack every possible layer, not just what is easy.
> There are things that happen in the HTTP layer itself, also in
cryptographic layers etc.
When there are so many (~all) systems with active content enabled, it must
take a really curipusly demented hacker (or agent or whatever) to attack
passive layers.
So I am hiding behind the flock.
> OTOH, I use it in totally passive mode. No active content processing is
enabled. No exposures, no vulnerabilities.
Well, just because you disable the colorful stuff doesn't mean there are no
exposures or vulnerabilities. There are things that happen in the HTTP layer
itself, also in
Re: Midori
> The files in the archive were from 2015. So it is most likely too insecure
already.
That is one of the reasons why Midori is removed from future releases of
Debian.
[QUOTE]
The final stable release of Midori still uses the unmaintained WebKit1
instead of webkit2gtk and
> My most favorite bug: Whenever you type the letter "b" in URL entry line as
the first character, it crashes. Only crashes on the letter "b", only when it
is the first character typed in URL line. Copy-pasting such a line doesn't
cause it to crash, though.
Just checked again, and the bug
> I always wondered indeed how come different hardware with same programs use
different amount of RAM memory.
Different kernel, different drivers, different system resources => different
if-then-else executed by the browser code.
> what about Palemoon or Basilisk internet browsers?
You can read more in the web browsers thread.
Fresh news about Basilisk: the developers say it is not a "high-sec
environment browser" so they refuse to even look at the privacy issues it
inherits from Firefox. Palemoon is by the same
> Qupzilla is very good so far, I am quite enjoying it. Tx for metioning it
and thus stimulating my autismo. \o/
You are welcome. :)
As I use LXQt (though installed both LXQt and Xfce) I depend on whatever Qt
environment LXQt provides by default. That is possibly why I didn't run into
the
I always wondered indeed how come different hardware with same programs use
different amount of RAM memory.. My laptop has 3 gb of RAM. Had no idea about
'crowdedness'. A fresh FF (no addons) when loaded uses exactly 140 mb of RAM
here. Once the three addons I use are installed it goes up to
Using the awesome thing a search browser is (I'm looking at you GrevenGull :P
) I managed to fix both the issues.
I did notice before that the only other qt5 program I used had the same issue
(GTK theme and fonts) but was not aware it was an issue with qt5..
So, the fix for the GTK theme
> Have you a fix for the font rendering issue? Fonts are terrible, just
terrible.
There is no problem with fonts at all in my version 2.2.3
> what about Palemoon or Basilisk internet browsers?
I have a very simple program hunting strategy. If it is not on Debian, expect
some blatant or between-the-lines issue with that program.
Palemoon and Basilisk are not in Debian repositories. If I am not desperate,
then I look no further,
[SuperTramp83]
> Without addons the recent versions of FF take around 150 mb of RAM when
opened,
[/SuperTramp83]
[me]
> Now I have just freshly started Firefox (one tab, blank page) and its RAM
usage is 270572 K.
[/me]
Just in case anyone wonders why there is such a big difference, it is
what about Palemoon or Basilisk internet browsers?
なんで気分がそんなに悪くなったの？メンバーの喧嘩のせいですか？
Trisquel 8 is getting closer, but will it give me:
* user switching
* GNOME 3.22 or later
* Kodi
* GNOME Videos YouTube search
* Gedit with header bar
* Firefox 57 without Pocket/ads
* WebRTC
* Mozc
* LUKS
* extract RAR files
* color emoji
* emoji input
* Flatpak
* Replicant dev tools
* updates
I thought so. I will compile the latest source. Am curious :)
>streaming of video using torrents
Just taking advantage of this post to promote one of my favorite softwarez ->
https://github.com/mafintosh/peerflix
Hi jxself !
Thanks for the link and the long message !
Nice to be kept informed.
I just downloaded the previous iso yesterday, tried testing it today,
but it doesn't fallback to the vesa driver ?!
Normally I would boot into trisquel live then install and edit xorg.conf but
this doesn't seem
Re: Qupzilla
> Yes, but for some reason I did not like it (the version in Debian Stable,
1.8.9). I just reinstalled it. Will re-test it later today.
Qupzilla is in a rather fast development cycle, so Debian stable might not be
hte best way to evaluate it. I'm on Debian testing and
It is particularly interesting for those who use the mailing list.
OK. I quit this discussion of this thread. I don't know what I do as a person
who made this thread, so I state that here now. I started feeling a smell of
general forums. I don't like a worldly forum as I said. I got the creap from
some posts. I think that from beggining to a while, question
> Bugori
:)
Yes it is somewhat buggy but so much as to render it unusable, at least for
me. It should be normal, given that it is orphaned for a few years. Still, I
use it for 99% of my web browsing. I'm just being careful not to touch its
sore points.
My most favorite bug: Whenever you
WebTorrent is a new tech which enables streaming of video using torrents. It
is Free software:
https://webtorrent.io
(MIT Licence)
There is a dedicated WebTorrent client, which I hope will be the default in a
Trisquel installation, instead of Transmission, which does not support
> The telemetry component does not report the pages the users visit.
It does much more than that, including things like scrolls, clicks, your
preferences etc:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection#Data_Collection_Categories
> A victim of proprietary software, yes.
No, he does
fsfeggsdgfsdfkjasdlnkjsadlvjnsadlvnsdlvsndvlsadvn!! !
Si, si...
>Have you tried midori
Bugori, one of the worst software I ever used. It's also abandoned,
unmaintained software (and for a good reason I would say). :P
>Qupzilla
Yes, but for some reason I did not like it (the version in Debian Stable,
1.8.9). I just reinstalled it. Will re-test it later
I don't know what it is but I like it
there is not a single mention that free software (like Firefox/forks) can
also report that you are "reading page 5" (through telemetry)
The telemetry component does not report the pages the users visit.
Doesn't that say that in the world of free software you won't be a victim? -
Yes, it
I am tired of you, honestly.
When I say something like "There is red apple on the table" it seems you
would never understand it. You would rather argue that Red is the name of a
company producing digital cameras, or philosophize about Apples' OSX or about
tables as in a database. Then you
You are twisting my words again and again. And you seem to twist even what
your favorite authorities say.
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/20140407-geneva-tedx-talk-free-software-free-society
Watch the video:
4:20-6:20 - Does that create the impression that it is possible to have that
also in
I have already talked about it in a different thread. You can read what I
have written on this so far from the post below...
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/there-perfect-method-guard-our-communication?page=3#comment-128249
...and the following posts, upto this one...
34 matches
Mail list logo
