There must have been an earlier ISO dated 03-20 because I get a different
md5sum between the ISO I downloaded on 21st and today. I used wget and BSD
md5, not GNU-md5sum.
I cannot replicate this:
# devel server
ruben@devel:/home/systems/makeiso2/iso$ md5sum trisquel_8.0_amd64.iso
3848629d433baad78d64d507a89bef65 trisquel_8.0_amd64.iso
# office workstation, after wget
ruben@deskstation:~$ md5sum trisquel_8.0_amd64.iso
3848629d433baad78d64d507a89bef65
Yeah, there's something going on. I get the same "faa" as you but not the
stated md5sum.
Hi people from everywhere:
Yesterday I downloaded the last Trisquel's .ISO (Flidias) and I verified it.
The first time I did it the md5sum was coincident, so I downloaded the .ISO
again, with the same result:
1. The md5sum calculated for the .ISO that I downloaded is:
what does
$ cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager
give you ?
> $ startx
EE) (EE) Server terminated with error (1). Closing log
file.e/trisquel/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log" for additional information(
xinit: giving up
xinit: unable to connect to X server: Connection refused
xinit: server error
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Seems like you have replied to a deleted reply.
come again?:)
Thank you for trying to help. There are no broken packages in Synaptic
Package Manager
I quote quidam from last Friday meeting:
I was able to replicate issues with booting the live cd on real computers
(works fine on vms). I think it is one parameter in the live cd boot, that
should be deprecated (the one that makes it wait for usb)
So hopefully if it is not fixed in that
`--install-recommends` will install non-free Microsoft fonts on your Trisquel
GNU/Linux system. To fix that use `--no-install-recommends` switch :)
Did you try ?
$ startx
> Architecture: x86_64
You have a 64-bit machine, so using the 64-bit version of Trisquel is not the
problem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Which method now is the legit one?
Oridinarily you would want to use the version in your distro's repo unless you
had a specific reason for needing a newer version. Unforunately, some
dependencies of wine appear to be broken for you, though I am unsure of the
reason. The next thing to try
> It may just be that Wine is (for
> the moment?) not installable on Trisquel 8, which is still alpha.
That's what confuses me. Grevengull's experience is similar to what I've had
when trying to install software that has not been packaged for T8, yet I am
able to install wine on T8. He has run
If I do
$ sudo aptitude install wine
It gives me this: https://pastebin.com/b3rdbb3B
Which is kind of interesting.
First the terminal outputs "The following NEW packages will be installed:"
followed be a list of packages.
Then "0 packages upgraded, 148 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0
> Your /etc/apt/sources.list "looked" OK but was not OK: "flidas" on the
winehq line should be "xenial", as mason spotted.
I think I have tried several methods with both of them.
But now I have removed all the wine associated packages and repositories.
Which method now is the legit one?
Yes. Everything looks OK then. It may just be that Wine is (for the
moment?) not installable on Trisquel 8, which is still alpha.
> The lines you needed to remove were these.
Well they're all gone now anyway. Just figured I'd start over.
> run 'lscpu' in a terminal and see what it says under "Architecture".
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit
Hi, thank you for tuning in M. B.
> If there are package repositories to remove, they must be define in files
in /etc/apt/sources.list.d
My /etc/apt/sources.list.d-folder is completely empty now.
> Notice that you can use as well a graphical interface to manage the
software repositories:
Their problem sounds like the same problem I've had with the last four Trisquel
ISOs. For me, Ctrl+Alt+F1 does indeed give me a login prompt, from which I can
login withh username "trisquel" and password "".
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Yes, it seems that some people have this issue while for others there is no
problem, so I wonder if it is a hardware thing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The lines you needed to remove were these.
deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ flidas main
# deb-src https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ flidas main
The correct line was
deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ xenial main
as for your question about 32/64-bit, you should
That looks OK. If there are package repositories to remove, they must be
define in files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d
Notice that you can use as well a graphical interface to manage the software
repositories: "Software & Updates" in the "System Settings" (well, that is
for Trisquel 7 at
I sorted by "installed" in Synaptic Package Manager and searched for wine.
The results was some 10 packages or something all called something along
"libwin". I proceeded to check them all for complete removal.
The first one had to remove some other packages in order to be removed (some
If you press Ctrl+Alt+F1, do you get some text or even a login prompt?
Usually when I try to install wine I get the
"Depends wine1.6 but it is not going to be installed".
But when I followed Masons suggestion to use this guide
https://wiki.winehq.org/Ubuntu and use the Linux Mint 18.x-line, I get this:
https://pastebin.com/1r6Y48sn
..which is kind og
Could the problems be connected to the fact that I am using a 64-bit version
of Trisquel 8 and should've been using 32-bit?
I am using a 2008 iMac. When I was boot camping MacOS and Windows, Apple said
that only 32-bit windows was supported for this model. Could it be the case
here as
Any ideas anyone? I had a look at past forum posts, but couldn't seem to find
any which were exactly relevant to what my issue is.
When I do $ pluma /etc/apt/sources.list I get this output first:
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "topmenu-gtk-module"
And then pluma opens: https://pastebin.com/vBwfGnqh
I stand corrected. Thanks for the detailed response :)
Magic Banana:
>> Where have you read it has to do with "untrusted packages"? > "Requires
installation of untrusted packages
This requires installing packages from unauthenticated sources."
I saw this come up on mine and was like "Hey! Someone got my Flidas all wet!"
I used Unetbootin to make a bootable USB drive. I had no problem booting and
getting to the desktop. The latest ISO 03-20 works fine with me.
34 matches
Mail list logo
