Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-17 Thread masonhock
I think that your confusion is with copyright and copyleft work and how  
licenses apply to software. You seem to be under the impression that the  
license applies to only binaries, but it applies to the source code. Having  
access to the source code does not allow you to use, modify, or distribute it  
under a different license. If that were that case the GPL would be useless,  
because someone could redistribute GPL-licensed software under a proprietary  
license. If you use, modify, or distribute proprietary software as if it were  
GPL-licensed, you will be breaking the law.


This might clarify some things: https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-17 Thread i_write_words
The down and dirty explanation for my nine year old, as far as reverse  
engineering Minetest texture packs and other little kid stuff, is that if you  
don't see the GPL, it's proprietary so hands off.


Of course I have a deeper understanding when I've had my coffee. ;)

There are other licenses, of course, but one of the advantages of Trisquel  
over Mint for "average joes" like myself and my family is that we don't have  
to worry about licensing.


And let's face it, when we are under  stress or losing our tempers about  
trolls is when we are most likely to make mistakes.


It's not a joke when I say that switching from  
as-free-as-I-could-make-it-at-the-time Ubuntu to Trisquel when I did probably  
saved me from violating copyright laws in my country, getting caught, and  
getting my half-educated self in a lot of trouble.


Having licensing issues taken care of by trustworthy individuals gives us the  
space to learn, grow, and in some cases become hackers themselves and give  
back to the community.


It's great to see so many new-to-Gnu people posting lately as well as  
new-to-Trisquel people. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-17 Thread hd-scania
I of course know how a free and copyleft license works, our GPL is notable  
one, you are licensed which you must fully protect freedom and must restrict  
nothing, must stand firm against every back-doors and every surveillances.
But I honestly dunno how free but permissive licenses (like BSD clauses) and  
nonfree licenses (like m$) work.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread i_write_words

Thank you.

I just can't bring myself to install Mint, but my peeps may well be a lot  
more vulnerable than your peeps, ergo my (sometimes ever verging on  
irrational) passion for Trisquello, despite my blase ho hum irreverent  
attitude towards the achievements of the illustrious Senor Poettering and  
curiosity about more challenging projects to tinker with.


We do live in interesting times.






Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread greatgnu

>I never particularly liked Linux Mint

As much as I'd dislike having in it on a computer that I own (not gonna  
happen) even more so I like it installed on a mate's computer: it really is  
the only distro my semi-illiterate mates NEVER have any issue, give credit  
where it's due.. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread i_write_words

Hi gd_scandia,

I remember doing that. I never particularly liked Linux Mint, but I did a  
bunch of small newbie friendly distros like Simply Mepis, LXLE, AntiX, etc.  
on VMs whenever I got frustrated by all the trolls on the Trisquel boards my  
first year or so in the community.


I guess it was good for blowing off steam, but not much else.

You get over it; there are more efficient ways to utilize your resources.  
Looks like others have got your back as far as the reasons why that doesn't  
work the same way they had mine.


Sort of makes goosebumps run up and down your spine, like the little green  
sprouts that poke up through the cracks in the pavement, reaching for the  
sun, still believing that life could turn out to be something beautiful.


But I digress.





Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread onpon4
"Suspectedly" is not a word, so that doesn't help at all. What do you mean by  
"suspectedly written"?


> Of course you cant relicense their binaries, but if they are the sources?

No difference. It's still copyrighted. Copyright works on all works, not just  
compiled binaries.


> unless this is prohibited against the original license.

You don't understand how licenses work. Licenses grant you permission to do  
something. It's copyright which prohibits certain actions, and copyright is  
automatic.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread onpon4

That doesn't make sense to me either. What are you talking about?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread hd-scania

"Licenses which are suspectedly written".
Of course you cant relicense their binaries, but if they are the sources?  
Sources mean where you make a derivative, of course you are free to license  
you this work under GPL, unless this is prohibited against the original  
license.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-16 Thread hd-scania

"Taking denials against one" is antonym against "taking credits for him".


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread onpon4

You can't relicense code you don't hold the copyright to.

What does "licenses suspectedly written to us" mean?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread onpon4
"freeware" and "free software" are not the same thing. "Freeware" typically  
refers to software which is available at no charge.


I don't know what you mean by "take denials against Torvalds".


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread hd-scania
Do you mean that, nonfreeware packages those aren’t blobs should be mostly  
‘‘nonfree’’ due to their licenses suspectedly written to us? If so we  
should need to re-license these nonfreeware sources under GPL to be free  
software?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread masonhock
You won't find a silver bullet that that magically removes all non-free  
packages and leaves you with a working system. Even if you used deblob-check  
to test all source code for blobs and found that everything flagged is either  
unnecessary or can be rebuilt with the blobs removed, you would still have to  
research the licenses, as they can't be automatically detected from the  
source code. I'm sure that there are other challenges I'm unaware of. If an  
arbitrary OS could be liberated in a day there would be a Trisquel release  
immediately after each Ubuntu release.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread onpon4
vrms doesn't work on Linux Mint. Mint uses its own packages which are jumbled  
in sections with no regard to whether they're libre or not, and those  
sections are what vrms depends on to work.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread hd-scania
The vrms program will analyze the set of currently-installed packages on a  
Debian system, and report all of the packages from the non-free tree (and,  
optionally, from contrib) which are currently installed.
The vrms package is however somewhat misleading since its name suggests it  
has to do with RMS while it in facts follows the Debian definition of free.  
For example things under the GFDL are considered non-free by Debian and free  
by RMS.
Said the FSF directories. But what are mistaken not approving vrms under GNU  
or FSF? This directory has not explicitly told what are mistaken, what are  
the (possible) conflicts between GPL and DFSG?
Because of the nonfree Debian kernels Debian has no policies against nonfree  
drivers and firmware, but yes against nonfree front ends outside DFSG. Why  
vrms still cant be approved under GNU and FSF?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread lap4fsf

Hi gd_scania,

FYI, vrms follows Debian's definitions of free software rather than that of  
the GNU project.[1]


Richard M Stallman ** DOES NOT ** agree with many of the views expressed by  
the program's output. Free Software Foundation lists vrms among packages that  
don't respect its Free System Distribution Guidelines.[2]


In my earlier days with Debian GNU/Linux, I too had installed the package,  
thinking it was a tool to liberate my computer. Later I understood my mistake  
and promptly removed it from my installation.


DON'T think that simply removing those packages proposed by vrms will make  
your Linux Mint free/liberated like a magic!


References:
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-users/2007-02/msg00027.html
[2]  
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines#vrms




[Trisquel-users] Linux Mint liberated!

2017-10-15 Thread hd-scania

hd-sca...@users.sf.net, [15.10.17 14:12]
[Forwarded from hd-sca...@users.sf.net]
hd_scania@hardened ~ $ aptitude search vrms
p   vrms   
   - virtual Richard M. Stallman

hd_scania@hardened ~ $ sudo apt install -y vrms && sudo vrms
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  vrms
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 302 not upgraded.
Need to get 12.5 kB of archives.
After this operation, 39.9 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 tor+http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 vrms all  
1.18 [12.5 kB]

Fetched 12.5 kB in 1s (9,020 B/s)
Selecting previously unselected package vrms.
(Reading database ... 235533 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../apt/archives/vrms_1.18_all.deb ...
Unpacking vrms (1.18) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ...
Setting up vrms (1.18) ...
   Non-free packages installed on hardened.mint

atmel-firmware  Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wireless  
networking chips.

bluez-firmware  Firmware for Bluetooth devices
firmware-atherosBinary firmware for Atheros wireless  
cards

firmware-bnx2   Binary firmware for Broadcom NetXtremeII
firmware-bnx2x  Binary firmware for Broadcom NetXtreme II  
10Gb
firmware-brcm80211  Binary firmware for Broadcom 802.11  
wireless cards
firmware-intelwimax Binary firmware for Intel WiMAX  
Connection
firmware-ipw2x00Binary firmware for Intel Pro Wireless  
2100, 2200 and
firmware-ivtv   Binary firmware for iTVC15-family MPEG  
codecs (ivtv an

firmware-iwlwifiBinary firmware for Intel Wireless cards
firmware-libertas   Binary firmware for Marvell Libertas 8xxx  
wireless car
firmware-linux  Binary firmware for various drivers in  
the Linux kerne
firmware-linux-nonfree  Binary firmware for various drivers in  
the Linux kerne
firmware-qlogic Binary firmware for QLogic IBA7220,  
QLA1xxx, ISP2xxx a

firmware-ralink Binary firmware for Ralink wireless cards
firmware-realtekBinary firmware for Realtek wired and  
wireless network


Contrib packages installed on hardened.mint

virtualbox-guest-dkms   x86 virtualization solution - guest  
addition module so
virtualbox-guest-utils  x86 virtualization solution - non-X11  
guest utilities
virtualbox-guest-x11x86 virtualization solution - X11 guest  
utilities


hd-sca...@users.sf.net, [15.10.17 14:12]
[Forwarded from hd-sca...@users.sf.net]
16 non-free packages, 0.7% of 2166 installed packages.
  3 contrib packages, 0.1% of 2166 installed packages.
hd_scania@hardened ~ $ sudo apt purge -sy atmel-firmware bluez-firmware  
firmware-atheros firmware-bnx2 firmware-bnx2x firmware-brcm80211  
firmware-intelwimax firmware-ipw2x00 firmware-ivtv firmware-iwlwifi  
firmware-libertas firmware-linux firmware-linux-nonfree firmware-qlogic  
firmware-ralink firmware-realtek virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-utils  
virtualbox-guest-x11

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  atmel-firmware* bluez-firmware* firmware-atheros* firmware-bnx2*  
firmware-bnx2x* firmware-brcm80211* firmware-intelwimax* firmware-ipw2x00*  
firmware-ivtv* firmware-iwlwifi*
  firmware-libertas* firmware-linux* firmware-linux-nonfree* firmware-qlogic*  
firmware-ralink* firmware-realtek* virtualbox-guest-dkms*  
virtualbox-guest-utils* virtualbox-guest-x11*

0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 19 to remove and 299 not upgraded.
Purg atmel-firmware [1.3-4]
Purg bluez-firmware [1.2-3]
Purg firmware-atheros [0.43]
Purg firmware-bnx2 [0.43]
Purg firmware-bnx2x [0.43]
Purg firmware-brcm80211 [0.43]
Purg firmware-intelwimax [0.43]
Purg firmware-ipw2x00 [0.43]
Purg firmware-ivtv [0.43]
Purg firmware-iwlwifi [0.43]
Purg firmware-libertas [0.43]
Purg firmware-linux [0.43]
Purg firmware-linux-nonfree [0.43]
Purg firmware-qlogic [0.43]
Purg firmware-ralink [0.43]
Purg firmware-realtek [0.43]
Purg virtualbox-guest-dkms [4.3.36-dfsg-1+deb8u1]
Purg virtualbox-guest-x11 [4.3.36-dfsg-1+deb8u1]
Purg virtualbox-guest-utils [4.3.36-dfsg-1+deb8u1]
hd_scania@hardened ~ $ sudo apt purge -y atmel-firmware bluez-firmware  
firmware-atheros firmware-bnx2 firmware-bnx2x firmware-brcm80211  
firmware-intelwimax firmware-ipw2x00 firmware-ivtv firmware-iwlwifi  
firmware-libertas firmware-linux firmware-linux-nonfree firmware-qlogic  
firmware-ralink firmware-realtek virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-utils  
virtualbox-guest-x11 && vrms

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency