Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox replaced Iceweasel on Debian Stretch

2016-04-15 Thread jadedml
Here's the story: https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-user@lists.debian.org/msg699377.html

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox replaced Iceweasel on Debian Stretch

2016-04-15 Thread strypey
There's also: * proprietary Adobe code for implementing DRM ("EME") * Hello, which has proprietary dependencies on the back-end - similiar issue to UbuntuOne I wrote about these in more detail here:

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox replaced Iceweasel on Debian Stretch

2016-04-15 Thread gromobir
Will Trisquel also make that switch? If not, why not?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox replaced Iceweasel on Debian Stretch

2016-04-15 Thread allanitomwesh
There are several issues why not. Pocket is non free and now a default. Addons page of Mozilla has ALOT of non free addons Firefox supports DRM in some installs

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox replaced Iceweasel on Debian Stretch

2016-04-15 Thread jason
I hope not because I am not entirely sure that the problems are over. There was discussion here: https://trisquel.info/en/forum/will-firefox-replace-abrowser-trisquel-8 although onpon4 missed something when they said "Mozilla's trademark policy doesn't say anything about permitting use of the