Re: [Trisquel-users] LinuxVoice interview: Mir vs. Wayland

2014-10-18 Thread davidvargas1

the following article/ comment summarizes everything.

However, i also guess there were political considerations, in particular  
Canonical feel they got burnt by Gnome. That relationship was unsatisfactory  
in terms of realising their mobile ambitions and convergence goals.


NIH was undoubtedly a factor, along with other factors – technical,  
political and commercial.


Also I understand that Gnome, KDE, and other relevant projects, would prefer  
to cater for Wayland as the only new emerging display server, and not another  
display server as well (Mir).


Ultimately it’s Canonical own money, and so they can do what they want. But  
in fairness to them, they have lofty ambitions of convergence, and commercial  
imperative to deliver their vision.

=
1- there were political considerations, in particular Canonical feel they got  
burnt by Gnome


2- That relationship was unsatisfactory in terms of realising their mobile  
ambitions and convergence goals.


3- NIH was undoubtedly a factor, along with other factors – technical,  
political and commercial.


4- Ultimately it’s Canonical own money, and so they can do what they want.

Good luck in that, canonical! be ready to compete and lose money with the  
competition, your money is just pennies to the competition.


[Trisquel-users] LinuxVoice interview: Mir vs. Wayland

2014-10-17 Thread zatroch

http://www.linuxvoice.com/interview-thomas-vos-of-mir/