Yeah, I had a similar experience with Motif dependencies for a program I
wanted to use. This is another reason why I won't use Debian; they
don't have my back, they don't even use the same definition of 'free'.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Also, Debian includes stuff which might require some proprietary code,
like Chromium and Electron, which Parabola removed for this reason.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Yeah, as if trisquel is up-to-date and fast with releases...
"Which OS is wrong?"
They're both right. The firmware was originally proprietary but was freed on
March 8, 2013. But it didn't appear in Debian Unstable until March
***2017***, an entire four years later and even then, it won't appear in a
Debian stable release until Debian 10 codename
On 01/12/17 22:11, wrote:
> Debian is 100% free and so is Trisquel. But in Debian it's possible to
> install non-free software.
You don't have a clue, my dear.
In Trisquel is possible to install non-free software.
In Debian not only is possible to install non-free software, but
If Stretch or older you'll need this.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/firmware-ath9k-htc
Which version of Debian do you have?
Debian is 100% free and so is Trisquel. But in Debian it's possible to
install non-free software. When I'm using Trisquel my TP-Link WN422G (usb
wifi adapter) works perfectly without any modifications, but on Debian
requires non-free firmware (firmware-atheros). What is going on? Which OS is
