It is a challenge or a nightmare for more than 99% musicians rather than an
advice.
Similarly, Cezanne is nightmare for more than 99% painters.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=79geSY9jQLQ
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S0bkJYQdCSQ
MSuzuqi wrote:
"But I have thought that it is difficult for me to translate that since my
English skill."
Your understanding of written English seems pretty good to me. As long as you
can understand the English text that needs translating, I'm sure you'd do a
great job of expressing its
> I am interest in translating of course. It seems fun. But I have
> thought that it is difficult for me to translate that since my
> English skill.
How comfortable do you feel with understanding the English documentation
yourself? For example, this page:
Thanks. It cleared my questions some degree.
But I can think that testing and reporting are very important and helpful
works, but I also want a something gaudy and jolly work like a festival which
we all can join and excites us..., if can. Though just using Trisquel excited
me.
I am
> so the delay forced to
> basing Trisquel 8 on Ubuntu 16.04.
Not exactly. Trisquel 8 was always going to be based on 16.04. It just took
longer than usual. Trisquel 9 was always going to be based on 18.04, which is
why development of Trisquel 9 can't begin until 18.04 is released later this
I see. Thanks.
So am I understand to that:
•Trisquel 8 was delayed unexpectedly reason (I understand lacking manpower
and Mr. Ruben was worked at FSF are main reason), so the delay forced to
basing Trisquel 8 on Ubuntu 16.04. (Releasing Trisquel 8 which is based on
Ubuntu 18.04 before
> But I wonder to seem that
> discussion stopped on the way in spite of not having a valuable and
> reasonable conclusion.
You are somewhat new to the forum, so you may not realize that this discussion
has been had many times already. I think many of us would find it boring to
continue to have
After all, does anyone give me a brief easy conclusion? I cannot understand
which assertion is more reasonable.
I am a begginer, but,
>since Trisquel 8 is based on an almost 2 year old system.
sounds strange. That's understandable. I mean, why does it be based on 2 year
old system? might be a
So icedove isn't at all bloated?
I use iceweasel with a few addons,
noscript being an obvious one of them given that it is like giving the tank
armor part of that which is firefox. Or in my case iceweasel. Hyperbola has
iceweasel package that is hardened which I use. ;)
ps, emulation can
>The only thing I use my system that is not lightweight is my web browser,
email client, and sometimes emulation of sorts including dosbox.
Browser (Firefox) is the only bloat here (if we don't count the TorBB that
is).
Light software FTW \o/
Okay, its not really mature to thumb up your own post. Or to downvote
everyone you disagree with.
but yeah... you just make yourself look silly.
I just like the idea of a stable, secure, lightweight os.
The only thing I use my system that is not lightweight is my web browser,
email client, and sometimes emulation of sorts including dosbox.
Come on.. Deblobbed Buguntu 8 will be ready in a year or so.. What's the
hurry? After all it's only been 700 days since it's base came out :D
> They say they are speeding up its development
speeding up: snail speed --> turtle speed?
> 18.04 will be Trisquel 9
When? XXII century?
Nope, it is quite useful - this thread is raising the awareness. Trisquel is
in a deep trouble, and to get out of this situation 1st of all we should
admit this trouble and don't bury head in the sand
Even if you'll give a small donation of a million dollars to Trisquel, it
will still be deep behind the Ubuntu. I'm seeing so many +100 euro donations
but its' just a waste of money and despite all these donation there is still
no Trisquel 8. Donation is an investment, and in this case its'
loldier, I agree with t3g that it might be better to prioritize the release
of Trisquel 9 over releasing both Trisquel 8 and Trisquel 9, since Trisquel 8
is based on an almost 2 year old system. Since Ubuntu LTS releases are
supported for 5 years, Trisquel does not need to offer all the
Magicbanana, sorry, but I hate to say, I find this entertaining... although
utterly stupid and pointless.
And yes, unproductive in many different ways.
Yes, this!
"if you need more up to date software libraries and packages in the meantime
you can try the stable Hyperbola distribution (based on Arch with Debian
patches but not a rolling release)"
t3g should try this idea.
Although, encryption is a little trickier, but meh, better than
Yes Jxself, I bet he couldn't fork Trisquel anymore than I could.
That's kind of what the first post I made was trying to say, albeit very
sarcasticly.
I usually don't see you get this steamed ever... He must have really crossed
the line huh...
Welp, somehow I am not surprised that t3g
Use jxself's linux-libre-lts package. And you can have another way to boot
the system if need be. Just a thought.
What exactly are you agreeing on? Everybody with half a brain "agrees" that
T8 is late. That goes without saying.
It doesn't follow that the OP is right about much anything. He's been
complaining about it, we know about it and there's nothing more to do about
it.
I use T8 on my HP
I agree with t3g that Trisquel should be based on an up to date version of
Ubuntu, so that it will be compatible with new software and libraries
(without requiring messing around with unofficial repositories). t3g, if you
need more up to date software libraries and packages in the meantime
onp...@riseup.net wrote ..
> Or they could finish the Trisquel 8 release and then start work on
Trisquel
> 9...
>
> Seems perfectly reasonable to me, given how close Trisquel 8 is to a
release.
That's what they're trying to do. I suggested it, and I got gung ho
about getting into Trisquel
t3g is half right, jxself. Your time and energy is too valuable to waste on
this pointless thread. Thanks for all that you do, and ignore the haters.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Why don't you also help with getting a free software OS out the door? Your
complaining messages don't motivate people to help, don't help the new
version come any faster, and if anything is a distraction.
Or they could finish the Trisquel 8 release and then start work on Trisquel
9...
Seems perfectly reasonable to me, given how close Trisquel 8 is to a release.
How about you spend less time attacking people personally and more getting a
free software OS out the door?
t3g, if you came to the Freedom Fridays meetings you would not be saying
these things. You don't even show up to the meetings on IRC and instead sit
on the sidelines and complain.
18.04 will be Trisquel 9.
Yes t3g because criticizing someones hard work when you do nothing to
contribute is totally a good way to show you care.
Yes this totally moves Ruben to want to work harder.
Indeed, feel free to flame him as much as you want. I am sure that will make
him work harder.
And I am sure that
Yep, this thread is kind of useless.
Wow this is really not helpful. Don't forget you are emailing a list of
volunteers, your not returning a broken toaster at Walmart.
For what it is worth, I am very grateful for all the hard work that has
gone into Trisquel. It's been grate for my business and home!
Wish I was in a better
Trisquel 8 isn't fully out and its based on the soon to be 2 year old Ubuntu
16.04 LTS. At this point, it may be wise for the Trisquel team to start fresh
with concentrating on the newer Ubuntu 18.04 code when it releases in April
2018.
I hate to have seen this project die out and these
34 matches
Mail list logo
