If I write sudo apt-get download abrowser on a trisquel computer, an abrowser
debian file will be downloaded on the computer and I can install and test it
on another gnulinux system?
I wrote trisquel and suggested they make an abrowser debian package. They
have not answered.
I do not know where to get the abrowser source code.
You can install extensions by downloading the .xpi and drag it onto
a browser window.
Funny: "Abrowser prevented this site from asking you to install software on
your computer"
Add it from here ->
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/download/1.9.16/uBlock0.firefox.xpi
I'm trying to add the ublock origin from
https://trisquel.info/en/browser/addons, but I get "the add-on could not be
loaded because of a connection failure".
Tried from Abrowser Add-ons menu as well, same result.
I'm not very experienced with Terminal, but could I use it to install
IMHO, it would be a much better idea to use a local web-proxy like Privoxy to
block these URLs.
Privoxy can work as an ad-blocker, a program to route web traffic through
Tor, and for blocking privacy-violating sites c:
Take that, guugle, we got you!
zoroastro: no.. Don't think now, because of WOT case that this is a frequent
behavior - it is not. Free software addons are safe in most cases. I just
recommend the rule of not installing what you don't really need, that's all.
And Html5Everywhere is indeed useful for you so..enjoy!
There's something against the Mozilla Firefox/Abrowser "Html5Everywhere"
plugin to flash players?
Thanks, I just contributed about VimFx.
>package for Debian
For debian linux distributions.
I really like the idea of having only 3 addons installed (though it seems it
demands knowing how to configure them, as far as I know, which isn't far). It
seems it would cover 99% of the needed protection if properly configured
(What are those 1%? No idea yet).
OTOH, let's say I mainly use
Magic Banana, how does it work exactly? Are addons catalog not part of the
repo? And Why Trisquel's catalog would be better/safer than Firefox's?
> Why do they not make an abrowser trisquel debian package?
Because it's not the Trisquel maintainers' job to make and maintain a package
for Debian. If you want an Abrowser package in Debian, no one is stopping you
from making and maintaining one.
tonlee, as Magique said, first of all make sure it is free software, then all
you can do is you trust only well known and trustworthy developers. Don't
install things you don't need, this should be the "philosophy" of it, I
think.
Yes. I have been suspecting addons to do what is described in the broadcast.
It is much like many apps on android and ios. If some addons are not malware,
I would know how to verify?
I disliked how the firefox gui got modified. I do not know if firefox can get
configured to the previous gui. That is why I installed the restore theme
addon. An addon that I do not trust and would prefer not to use.
Same about the addons zoom button and manually sort folders on thunderbird.
Thanks.
If it is a trisquel browser, do they not want people to install abrowser on
other distributions? Why do they not make an abrowser trisquel debian
package? Who at trisquel should I ask?
As you so eloquently put it, "Ill have to disagree with the incredibleness,
deficient and eloquent users."
Well then please explain to us poor deficient users HOW to access and change
those settings. What about modems? I know if I knew how to do it, I would.
The router I used to have had
Free software is gold, but it is no guarantee against malicious developers.
Free software can have malicious functionalities as well, it just is much
much less frequent.
Anyway, each new software you install on your box is a new potential way of
exploiting your box. The less addons you
Ill have to disagree with the incredibleness, deficient and eloquent users.
Best to block any HTTP, HTTPs or URL inside your routers. Is more effective
than your web browser, even do I'm able to block in the browser such as
Mozilla.
Thanks. Are all free software addons listed in abrowser?
Where do I get abrowser, it is not in debian 8 64bit's synaptic package
manager?
>I do not know if this is true, but it is what I have heard.
Firefox preferences -> security -> block dangerous and ... If this setting is
marked, any url you watch is send to google, because google verifies with
their url list. Google likely keeps the data. I do not know if google pays
I do not know if this is true, but it is what I have heard.
Firefox preferences -> security -> block dangerous and ... If this setting is
marked, any url you watch is send to google, because google verifies with
their url list. Google likely keeps the data. I do not know if google pays
24 matches
Mail list logo
