"His ISP would still be able to do surveillance, no?"
How's that any different from using any other DNS provider? (Answer: It's
not.) Even if the connection with the DNS servers were encrypted your ISP,
fundamentally, still has to send your traffic around. So they'll still know
who you're
Mabye there is a solution with DNSCrypt ?
https://dnscrypt.info/
I saw an intresting french video on it yesterday and it's got MIT Licence.
You are no longer in relation with your own internet company for DNS request,
but a DNS C server you can choose from a list given by the software.
But
Am I misunderstanding something?
Being your own DNS provider would only solve 1 of the 2 problems of OP?
His ISP would still be able to do surveillance, no?
MartinH wrote:
"But if I use jxself's method, I doubt very much that the root servers will
ever change their ip address !"
If they do, it will be trumpeted to the heavens with a major public
announcement, as every single DNS provider (commercial or gratis, public or
private), will have to
For Hong Kong is my nearest FREE DNS service from Japan thanks?
https://parabola.nu/packages/bind, the Bind server is also available in
Parabola, which I can just run Parabola for my upcoming NAS. :)
So, I heard about the cloudflare's DNS 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 can anyone
recommend this? They say they do log but anonymizes it... I am currently
using custom openninc servers which says that they do not log. I have solved
my problem in some website not being able to access, it was the DNSSEC.
I'm not sure about OpenDNS, used to be independent, now belongs to Cisco, and
yes, it
does block sites, you will have to use one of their paid services to be
uncensored.
But like you say, if you have kids it might be better.
H, debian.org works fine for me here.
Thanks jodiendo !
My ip address is dynamic, I've never felt the need to have a static one.
Currently still using dns.watch , but opennic sounds interesting, although
I'm not sure how reliable it is (uptime).
is OpenDNS not trustworthy, some opennic public servers that I use vanishes
sometimes but then I just switch to another
martinh
If you need more help or questions about your DNS issues. Ill do my best to
assist you.
Gentleman
I'm in the Philippines, I use the Singapore opennic server for resolution.
My isp locally is about 130 milliseconds, depends on the time of the day, but
using the DNS for Singapore Opennic server my ping averages about 54
millisecond it is superbly stable and encrypted, only the
gslima
There is no available FREE openNic dNS service for your country, the closest
is in Ecuador. You might want to star pinging their DNS and try them out.
Ecuador
1- 185.121.177.177
2- 169.239.202.202
3- 198.251.90.143
jxself
Yes, Opennic is all about public service and reliability not constraint and
fiscal ionization.
True !
But if I use jxself's method, I doubt very much that the root servers
will ever change their ip address !
I also agree with the fact that I don't want to be subject to other people
deciding what is right or wrong for me to visit on the web, as Jodiendo
pointed out.
Finally, why
everything is a matter of trust.
The only flaw of this method is that sometimes servers change ip addresses if
they change provider, as there is no portability on ip. But usually that's
quite noticeable, as you won't have access and have to make the process
again. Bu, there's a possibility if your group change ip
have you heard the man? Maybe he's serious on his job and want extra
security. You can query DNS directly with dig or other tool, directly the
root servers of most common accessed sites and put it on alias file. So it
wouldn't be necessary to install bind except for seeing the addresses
"TO BE A dns provider requires a machine dedicated for that service
Why you, should want to host a server for that purpose,?"
Maybe if you're running something as a public service but for someone's own
personal DNS resolution this is totally not needed. The method I proposed
would work
jxself
Partially i DISAGREE WITH YOU ON THIS ONE.
wHY?
TO BE A dns provider requires a machine dedicated for that service, that
takes time, skill and security settings to avoid spamming and overload.
Why you, should want to host a server for that purpose,?
when some one is just doing it
agree. But some people only want to have a life. /etc/host.aliases would do
the job if your system is impenetrable, for banking, as typing on the browser
some sites have extended verification, so they can't have proper access with
direct ip number.
In my country there's also this system of records (Brazil), also these can be
routed by the service provider if you have legal issues. Also physical
connection can be hijacked from third party, and routed by a regular microtik
router. For extra safety, I would recomend fiber optics. The
>'ll have to read about it
https://wiki.debian.org/Bind9
Thanks for the replies !
I wasn't aware about BIND at all. Sounds very interesting, I'll have to read
about it - thanks.
You are your own best DNS provider. It's not even hard: sudo apt install
bind9. BIND can query the root name servers for you and you're independent.
MartinH SAID:
Question though is: Does anyone know of similar ones that are Libre ?
(As in using libre software).
vISIT THE FOLLOWING WEB SITE SO YOU COULD LEARN MORE ABOUT DNS.
https://www.opennic.org/
Hi Everyone !
You may be aware that your ISP may block websites and also stores info
on you.
Here in the UK your ISP has to store all emails, visited websites and a host
of other stuff by law for at least 1 year !
I'm avoiding this by using a different DNS Provider/Resolver.
Currently that is:
27 matches
Mail list logo
